2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60538-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Structuring for Function Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the situations where axiomatic design has not been adopted in the teaching of engineering design, the insufficient training and practical experiences may be the reasons. Without good training and support axiomatic design may not appear to be as easy to follow as the more conventional, algorithmic, or systematic, methodological design methods [90]. These conventional methods lack the advantage of systematic evaluation that comes from being governed by axioms.…”
Section: Minimum Information Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the situations where axiomatic design has not been adopted in the teaching of engineering design, the insufficient training and practical experiences may be the reasons. Without good training and support axiomatic design may not appear to be as easy to follow as the more conventional, algorithmic, or systematic, methodological design methods [90]. These conventional methods lack the advantage of systematic evaluation that comes from being governed by axioms.…”
Section: Minimum Information Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will facilitate to arrive at innovative, new product designs [5] but at the same time these design problems become ill-structured ones that can be called coupled in Suh's terminology. We then analyzed ill-structured problems in design in contrast with well-structured problems based on Suh's design matrix concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of CSCWD, it is equivalent to introduce a moderator who can integrate opinions of different experts to help the leader (or designer) who makes the final decision. Technically, this approach will facilitate knowledge fusion (see Section 4.2) [5,9]. (3) Such ontological descriptions about a theory will help to identify conditions in which the theory is valid.…”
Section: Ill-structured Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is eloquently described in Seufert et al [4] who give specific emphasis to the integration of the epistemological and ontological dimensions of knowledge work. Linking structured knowledge to design is common engineering knowledge of which there are many referenced examples (see [5]). However, innovation also requires the right (heterogenic) combination of knowledge, know-how and tools [6], and such combinations in Knowledge Frameworks is not a new approach ( [7] and [8] provide examples).…”
Section: Innovative Design Knowledge Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%