2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Taxonomy for Developing Organizational Memory System (OMS) for Public Institutions of Higher Learning (IHL) in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cole et al, 1998), agricultural safety (e.g. Morgan et al, 2002), and higher education (Basaruddin and Haron, 2011;Wijetunge, 2012). ICTs therefore have a prominent role to play in organizational storytelling.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cole et al, 1998), agricultural safety (e.g. Morgan et al, 2002), and higher education (Basaruddin and Haron, 2011;Wijetunge, 2012). ICTs therefore have a prominent role to play in organizational storytelling.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stock et al (2010) proposed a potential role of digital libraries to institutionalize the organizational learning embodied in stories. Similarly, Basaruddin and Haron (2011) note that digital libraries can form the basis of a robust organizational memory system. Story metadata can form the basis of the knowledge taxonomy used to organize this content for efficient and effective future reuse.…”
Section: Role Of Information and Communication Technologies (Icts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge taxonomy, as discussed by (Basaruddin & Haron, 2011;Bentahar, Moulin, & Bélanger, 2010;Blackman & Henderson, 2005;Bolisani & Scarso, 2015) explain the types of knowledge related to business along with the necessary understanding of communication to transfer any notion of knowledge. Scrutiny of knowledge efficacy at this point often reflects egoistic conceptions of reality from a knowledge transfer practitioners perception or cautious belief of any experience other than that relative to the knowledge transfer scenario (Adams, Tranfield, & Denyer, 2011;Baporikar, 2016;de Silva Garza & Gero, 2009;Halilem et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%