2021
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge to action: a scoping review of approaches to educate primary care providers in the identification and management of routine sleep disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such activities are often both convenient and cost‐effective and can be maintained without draining staffing levels and disrupting delivery of patient care [19]. King et al [20] emphasise the importance of the clinical relevance of workplace‐based learning to motivate staff to participate. In Flekkefjord, the competence development programme made each employee responsible for completing modules responding to their lack of competence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such activities are often both convenient and cost‐effective and can be maintained without draining staffing levels and disrupting delivery of patient care [19]. King et al [20] emphasise the importance of the clinical relevance of workplace‐based learning to motivate staff to participate. In Flekkefjord, the competence development programme made each employee responsible for completing modules responding to their lack of competence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using the KTA model have demonstrated the dynamic, nonlinear aspect of knowledge translation and implementation [ 25 ]. However, recent scope reviews that used KTA in behavioral change in rehabilitation and educational interventions for the management of sleep disorders supported the complexity of knowledge implementation and recognized the need to (1) complement the KTA model with determinant models to better assess barriers to implementation and influence implementation outcomes and (2) guide the selection of implementation strategies [ 38 , 39 ]. Along the same line, our hybrid model supports the need for a determinant model (ie, the CFIR) to complement a process model (ie, KTA or GTO) and the need for a refined list of context- and evidence-based implementation and QI strategies to improve implementation fidelity, that is, the list of implementation strategies from Powell et al [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even among specialty NPs who practice in sleep centers, a 2012 survey study of NPs ( n = 45) and physician assistants ( n = 20) found that 84 percent of NPs reported that sleep-specific education was primarily received through “on-the-job” training, 9 percent through continuing education, 2 percent through formal education, and 9 percent from other sources (one NP selected three types of education; Colvin et al, 2014). A recent scoping review evaluating 22 studies found the most common educational approaches to educating primary care providers, including NPs, in the identification and management of sleep disorders included didactic (32 percent), active (18 percent), and blended (41 percent) approaches using technology-mediated (45 percent), face-to-face (27 percent), and multimodal (5 percent) delivery (King et al, 2021). By providing sleep curricular content, the practice of NPs in both specialty and primary care practices will be further enhanced to meet the health needs of the population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing awareness of sleep disorders among primary care providers (Simon, 2016), but this has not translated to widespread integration of sleep education into nursing curricula (Gellerstedt et al, 2019; Meaklim et al, 2020) despite numerous recommendations put forth over the years (Colten & Altevogt, 2006; King et al, 2021; Lee et al, 2004; Meaklim et al, 2020; Ramar et al, 2021; Redeker & McEnany, 2011; Ye & Smith, 2015). Some studies have addressed sleep education in nursing curricula (Colvin et al, 2014; Gellerstedt et al, 2019; King et al, 2021; McIntosh & MacMillan, 2009; Meaklim et al, 2020; Redeker & McEnany, 2011; Ye & Smith, 2015), but consistent with the prior decade of research, advanced practice nurses continue to report little (two hours) to no education about sleep and sleep disorders (Sawyer et al, 2022). Furthermore, a recent narrative review to evaluate sleep education provided across health care provider training programs included 16 published studies, only one of which focused on sleep in nursing curricula (Meaklim et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%