2016
DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge, use and perceived relevance of a profession’s Competency Standards; implications for Pharmacy Education

Abstract: Despite self-assessment against NCS being mandated annually, Australia's practising pharmacists provided explanations for why this is not common in practice. The barriers provided by respondents are interconnected; their enablers are practical solutions to each barrier. The findings reinforce the notion that student pharmacists must have their competency standards, life-long learning and self-assessment skills embedded into their university curriculum to ensure a strong foundation for practice. The opportunity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have considered these questions. In a recent study to determine the use and relevance of the “National Competency Standards Framework for Pharmacists in Australia,” it was found that students, interns and practising pharmacists had poor familiarity and use of the framework [31]. In a study in Thailand, 574 pharmacy practitioners and faculty members ranked pharmacy competency standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have considered these questions. In a recent study to determine the use and relevance of the “National Competency Standards Framework for Pharmacists in Australia,” it was found that students, interns and practising pharmacists had poor familiarity and use of the framework [31]. In a study in Thailand, 574 pharmacy practitioners and faculty members ranked pharmacy competency standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the original survey invited provisional (intern) pharmacists, educators, students and registered pharmacists, only the responses from registered pharmacists (including preceptors who are by definition registered pharmacists) will be reported on here. The results from all respondents are reported elsewhere [31]. This sample ( n = 158) represented less than 1% of registered Australian pharmacists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling technique combined snowball and convenience sampling [30] and was disseminated using a combination of social media and conference presentation. As described in greater detail elsewhere [31], participants that were interviewed for a related project were also invited to distribute the survey to their networks via email. Qualitative responses were analysed using thematic analysis [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor NCS familiarity across the Australian pharmacy profession, including amongst its educators and students (Nash, et al, 2015a;Nash, Chalmers, Stupans, & Brown, 2015b), may have negatively impacted on their ability to apply them in the education setting. As the NCS are actionorientated descriptions, the style of assessment and how well this matched the NCS and corresponding Miller's description may have also influenced interpretations.…”
Section: Limitations and Influencing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familiarity with the NCS among pharmacy students in Australia (Nash, Chalmers, Stupans, & Brown, 2015a) and at the university of interest was discovered to be poor (Nash, Chalmers, Stupans, Brown, 2016a). To address poor student familiarity with the NCS and develop students' self-reflection skills, the Traffic Light Report (TLR) project was conceptualised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%