Koalitionen in West- und Osteuropa. Theoretische Überlegungen und Systematisierung des Vergleichs

Kropp, Sabine; Schüttemeyer, Suzanne S.

doi:10.1007/978-3-663-10487-2_1

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature review demonstrates that research on coalition formation has generated a deep reservoir of cumulative knowledge (Laver and Schofield 1998;Kropp, Schüttemeyer, and Sturm 2002b;Müller, Bergman, and Strøm 2008). The formal coalition-centred theories, in particular the office-oriented minimal winning proposition and the policy-oriented minimal connected winning and minimal range propositions, continue to provide valuable insights into coalition formation across Europe.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research into coalition politics provides another point of reference for this study (for an overview, see Laver and Schofield 1998;Kropp, Schüttemeyer, and Sturm 2002b;Müller, Bergman, and Strøm 2008). Within this literature, the formation of coalition governments has been one of the earliest and most prominent puzzles that scholars have tried to solve.…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mainstream of coalition research follows a context-sensitive rational choice approach. Hence, scholars believe that coalition formation results from parties' strategic choices in the pursuit of office and policy, which are constrained by contextual factors, such as the institutional environment, the configuration of party systems or historical trajectories ( de Swaan 1973;Strøm 1990a;Strøm, Budge, and Laver 1994;Müller andStrøm 1999, 2000b;Kropp, Schüttemeyer, and Sturm 2002a;Mitchell and Nyblade 2008).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The formation of (majority) governments becomes more complex when the fragmentation of party systems increases (Dodd 1976;Kropp, Schüttemeyer, and Sturm 2002b;Müller, Bergman, and Strøm 2008). Depending on the unit of analysis, empirical studies find various effects of fragmentation on government formation.…”

Section: Party Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second common strategy for studying government formation uses (comparative) case studies to provide a comprehensive explanation of government formation in an individual case or a specific country over a certain period of time (Müller and Strøm 2000b;Kropp, Schüttemeyer, and Sturm 2002a;Bergman, Ilonszki, and Müller 2019a). These studies thus combine an intensive empirical design with a complete theoretical approach and use qualitative methods, such as process tracing.…”

Section: Research Designs In the Study Of Government Formationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Pariahs or Partners?

Kossack

2023

Edition Politik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the past three decades, radical right parties had the opportunity to directly influence political developments from the highest public office in many post-communist Central and Eastern European countries. Oliver Kossack provides the first comprehensive study on government formation with radical right parties in this region. Even after the turn of the millennium, some distinct features of the post-communist context persist, such as coalitions between radical right and centre-left parties. In addition to original empirical insights, the time-sensitive approach of this study also advances the discussion about concepts and methodological approaches within the discipline.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%