2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4863502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kohn-Sham band gaps and potentials of solids from the optimised effective potential method within the random phase approximation

Abstract: We present an implementation of the optimised effective potential (OEP) scheme for the exactexchange (EXX) and random phase approximation (RPA) energy functionals and apply these methods to a range of bulk materials. We calculate the Kohn-Sham (KS) potentials and the corresponding band gaps and compare them to the potentials obtained by standard local density approximation (LDA) calculations. The KS gaps increase upon going from the LDA to the OEP in the RPA and finally to the OEP for EXX. This can be explaine… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(178 reference statements)
5
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it has been shown that the KS band gap (defined as the conduction band minimum minus the valence band maximum) calculated with the exact (but unknown) potential v xc = δ E xc /δρ differs from the band gap Δ g by the derivative discontinuity Δ xc , 47 which can be of the same order of magnitude as the band gap Δ g itself. 8 In solid-state physics, the Green-functions-based GW methods provide a formal way of calculating the band gap Δ g from the quasi-particles band structure; 911 however, these methods lead to very expensive calculations and can not be applied routinely to large systems. In addition, the GW method is usually applied in a perturbative way, i.e., as a first-order correction to the orbital energies obtained from a self-consistent KS-DFT calculation, such that the results may depend strongly on the exchange-correlation functional used in the KS-DFT calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been shown that the KS band gap (defined as the conduction band minimum minus the valence band maximum) calculated with the exact (but unknown) potential v xc = δ E xc /δρ differs from the band gap Δ g by the derivative discontinuity Δ xc , 47 which can be of the same order of magnitude as the band gap Δ g itself. 8 In solid-state physics, the Green-functions-based GW methods provide a formal way of calculating the band gap Δ g from the quasi-particles band structure; 911 however, these methods lead to very expensive calculations and can not be applied routinely to large systems. In addition, the GW method is usually applied in a perturbative way, i.e., as a first-order correction to the orbital energies obtained from a self-consistent KS-DFT calculation, such that the results may depend strongly on the exchange-correlation functional used in the KS-DFT calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) with an XC potential constructed as a functional derivative, V scRPA XC = δE RPA XC /δρ. This self-consistent (sc) RPA scheme ensures compatibility between the total-energy functional and XC potential [24][25][26][27][28]. In contrast to the non-self-consistent case, in this scheme the RPA is being used to determine H 0 and thus E 0 + E X .…”
Section: B Single-particle Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although self-consistent RPA calculations have been demonstrated, they remain a significant technical challenge [24][25][26][27][28]. Therefore a key question to ask is how the choice of XC potential in the single-particle Hamiltonian affects the total energy calculated in a non-self-consistent RPA + EXX scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for Ge, CdO, and α-Sn the AK13 functional opens a band gap and thus remedies a qualitative failure of standard (semi)local functionals. As such, the AK13 band structure may serve as an improved and inexpensive starting point for higher level DFT methods [97] or beyond-DFT (GW) calculations.…”
Section: Outlook and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%