Ausführung Von Stahlbauten 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9783433604700.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kommentare zu DIN EN 1090‐2 Technische Regeln für die Ausführung von Stahlbauten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manufacturing tolerances (geometrical imperfections) for unstiffened buckling plates according to EN 1090-2 [3] Longitudinal direction According to Schmidt/Korth/Machura/Podleschny/Kammel/Volz [4], the distinction between longitudinal and transverse loads is necessary in order to also take effects from buckling behaviour like that of a column buckling into account. This distinction was first considered in DIN 18800-3 [5].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manufacturing tolerances (geometrical imperfections) for unstiffened buckling plates according to EN 1090-2 [3] Longitudinal direction According to Schmidt/Korth/Machura/Podleschny/Kammel/Volz [4], the distinction between longitudinal and transverse loads is necessary in order to also take effects from buckling behaviour like that of a column buckling into account. This distinction was first considered in DIN 18800-3 [5].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the column buckling behaviour it is necessary to distinguish between longitudinal and transverse loads (see Schmidt/Korth/ Machura/Podleschny/Kammel/Volz [4]). For the first time the load directions were considered in DIN 18800-3 [5].…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the determination of limit values according to EN 1090-2 [3] the direction of stress is to be taken into account, Table 1. Due to the column buckling behaviour it is necessary to distinguish between longitudinal and transverse loads (see Schmidt/Korth/ Machura/Podleschny/Kammel/Volz [4]). For the first time the load directions were considered in DIN 18800-3 [5].…”
Section: Geometrical Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%