2022
DOI: 10.58982/krisnadana.v1i3.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Komparasi Metode Ahp – Roc Dalam Penentuan Prioritas Alternatif Terbaik

Abstract: Komparasi metode penentuan bobot atau metode pembobotan ditujukan untuk mengetahui fungsionalitas metode dalam menghasilkan nilai bobot setiap kriteria, serta mengetahui hasil akhir perankingan berdasarkan nilai alternatif pada setiap kriteria. Bobot yang relatif dihasilkan sangat dipengaruhi oleh metode yang digunakan dalam menentukan bobot, karena itu pengambil keputusan diharuskan dapat menetapkan bobot setiap kriteria karena sangat penting dalam pengambilan keputusan. Untuk menghitung dan menentukan kriter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making method with assessment to find solutions to complex multi-criteria problems Oelviani, (2015) into parts and arranged in a hierarchical arrangement, so that with a synthesis it can be determined which element has the highest priority (Andika et al, 2022). AHP can also be used to determine priority weights for predetermined criteria or indicators (Diah et al, 2018;Santika et al, 2022;Wantoro, 2020). This research was analyzed using the help of the Superdecision application.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making method with assessment to find solutions to complex multi-criteria problems Oelviani, (2015) into parts and arranged in a hierarchical arrangement, so that with a synthesis it can be determined which element has the highest priority (Andika et al, 2022). AHP can also be used to determine priority weights for predetermined criteria or indicators (Diah et al, 2018;Santika et al, 2022;Wantoro, 2020). This research was analyzed using the help of the Superdecision application.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) adalah teknik dalam sistem pendukung keputusan yang digunakan untuk mengevaluasi dan memberi peringkat pada berbagai alternatif berdasarkan kriteria yang telah ditentukan. Metode ini melibatkan beberapa langkah, dimulai dengan menentukan kriteria yang relevan dengan keputusan yang akan diambil dan menetapkan bobot untuk setiap kriteria berdasarkan tingkat kepentingannya [16]. Selanjutnya, nilai dari setiap alternatif untuk setiap kriteria dinormalkan agar berada dalam skala yang seragam.…”
Section: Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw)unclassified
“…The data mapped into the EBM needs to be calculated to get each team's score over four months. Furthermore, to find out the final score in the form of the level of effectiveness of the Scrum team in the company based on all EBM components, the weighting is carried out using the Ranking Order Centroid (ROC) method [16,17] . Eq.…”
Section: Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%