2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.056601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kondo Effect in a Quantum Dot Coupled to Ferromagnetic Leads: A Numerical Renormalization Group Analysis

Abstract: We investigate the effects of spin-polarized leads on the Kondo physics of a quantum dot using the numerical renormalization group method. Our study demonstrates in an unambiguous way that the Kondo effect is not necessarily suppressed by the lead polarization: While the Kondo effect is quenched for the asymmetric Anderson model, it survives even for finite polarizations in the regime where charge fluctuations are negligible. We propose the linear tunneling magnetoresistance as an experimental signature of the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
213
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
18
213
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36 A spin-dependent hybridization for the spin-up and spin-down energy levels of the impurity is then predicted, resulting in an effective static magnetic field at the impurity site (this field can eventually be compensated by an external magnetic field). 29,31,35 In the presence of ferromagnetism, the Kondo resonance therefore splits apart as confirmed experimentally. 32,37 While such a splitting is well understood, the impact of a nonequilibrium spin current on the Kondo resonance has so far been little addressed in correlated nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 A spin-dependent hybridization for the spin-up and spin-down energy levels of the impurity is then predicted, resulting in an effective static magnetic field at the impurity site (this field can eventually be compensated by an external magnetic field). 29,31,35 In the presence of ferromagnetism, the Kondo resonance therefore splits apart as confirmed experimentally. 32,37 While such a splitting is well understood, the impact of a nonequilibrium spin current on the Kondo resonance has so far been little addressed in correlated nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[12][13][14][15][16] It has also been successfully evidenced in nanoscale devices, [17][18][19][20][21] in particular quantum dots, [17][18][19][22][23][24] carbon nanotubes, [25][26][27] and nanowires. 28 Of particular interest-especially in the context of spintronics, is the issue of screening in the presence of a magnetic environment such as spin-polarized electrodes [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and spinpolarized edge states. 36 A spin-dependent hybridization for the spin-up and spin-down energy levels of the impurity is then predicted, resulting in an effective static magnetic field at the impurity site (this field can eventually be compensated by an external magnetic field).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or a carbon nanotube 21 contacted with ferromagnetic leads has been justified by the oppositely directed spin polarizations in the electrodes, in agreement with refs. 22,23,24 . Although the situation regarding the magnetization of the leads might be similar in our system, we argue that the Kondo effect is still possible even if there is no domain wall pinned in the contact.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27) is given as a Dyson-like equation which is better seen by introducing the bare GF g satisfying the equation (iωI −∆ 0 )g(iω) = P. Then Eq. (27) can be re-written as…”
Section: B Transport Equation In the Hubbard I Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…atomic limit, non-interacting limit (on-site Coulomb repulsion U → 0), and the strongly correlated limit (U → ∞). While these limits have been treated several times, and the last limit has been treated in detail concerning Kondo physics, 22,23,24,25,26,27 it is important that the here presented material includes these limits. It is also important to note that the renormalisation of the localised level often discussed in scaling theory, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21 is included into the present formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%