2011
DOI: 10.14214/ma.5927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Koneellinen kitkentä taimikon varhaisperkauksessa – työajanmenekki, kustannukset ja työjäljen laatu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Naarva uprooter (Pentin Paja Ltd.) can reportedly clear an average of 0.14-0.16 ha of spruce seedling stand per productive work hour (PWh 15 , all delays max. 15 minutes included), i.e., 6.3-7.4 h ha -1 (Rantala and Kautto 2011;Hallongren and Rantala 2013), which is similar to the speed of manual cleaning. Therefore, the competitiveness of uprooting is greatly dependent on how well the treatment prevents the need for later pre-commercial thinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Naarva uprooter (Pentin Paja Ltd.) can reportedly clear an average of 0.14-0.16 ha of spruce seedling stand per productive work hour (PWh 15 , all delays max. 15 minutes included), i.e., 6.3-7.4 h ha -1 (Rantala and Kautto 2011;Hallongren and Rantala 2013), which is similar to the speed of manual cleaning. Therefore, the competitiveness of uprooting is greatly dependent on how well the treatment prevents the need for later pre-commercial thinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…1 m tall and operation should be done in adequately accurate manner by experienced operators, like in spruce seedling stands studied by Rantala and Kautto (2011) and Hallongren and Rantala (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A need nevertheless exists for new mechanisation ideas and business concepts that lower the need for human resources in forestry, while providing higher productivity, greater cost-efficiency, and quality improvements. Earlier research into the mechanisation of silvicultural work has focused on productivity, costs and quality (Saarinen 2004, Rantala and Laine 2010, Rantala and Kautto 2011, as well as biological issues (Luoranen et al 2011). Despite this, the fact remains that mechanisation of silvicultural works will proceed no further without profitable growth in the manufacture of the related machines and devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During early cleaning, such work is based on uprooting, where the device grips and lifts clutches of sprouts from the ground by their roots. In this case, cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on whether pre-commercial thinning is required after the mechanised uprooting (Rantala and Kautto 2011). All pre-commercial thinning devices are based on cutting blades (Strandström et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation