Konflik Politik Antara Gubernur Dan DPRD Dki Jakarta Dalam Proses Penetapan Apbd 2015

Abstract

In the implementation of regional autonomy and decentralization systems, the discourse on the pattern of power relations between the Regional Head and the Regional Representative Council (DPRD) is an interesting study. This is because in practice, the ups and downs of the relationship between the Regional Head and the Regional Parliament are influenced by the political dynamics that develop in the region, as was the case in the conflict between the Governor and the Regional Parliament of DKI Jakarta. Determination of the 2015 APBD. not only attracted a lot of public attention, but more importantly this case was a bad precedent for the administration of regional government. Starting from this, this study aims to analyze the factors that cause conflicts between the Governor and the DKI Jakarta DPRD in the 2015 APBD Determination, and to understand the patterns used in resolving political conflicts between the Governor of the DKI Jakarta DPRD in the 2015 APBD Determination.In order to answer the research problem, the theory used uses the theory put forward by Paul M. Collier who states that in general political conflict is caused by two things, namely because of differences in interests, and the seizure of scarce or very limited resources. While the theory of political conflict resolution used by Simon Fisher's theory, which states the pattern of conflict resolution is divided into three ways, namely negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. In accordance with the objectives to be achieved, this study was designed using qualitative research methods, with a case study approach. From the research findings, it is stated that the main factors causing conflict between the Governor and the DKI Jakarta DPRD in determining the 2015 APBD are the divided local government factor, and the difference in political interests between the Governor and the DKI Jakarta DPRD. The conflict between the Governor and the DKI Jakarta DPRD finally found a common ground after a long process of resolution. The pattern of conflict resolution used is a mediation approach, by involving the Indonesian Ministry of Internal Affairs in resolving the conflict, to find a meeting point that is mutually beneficial to both parties.

Vertical Conflict on Regional Autonomy between the Regent of the Meranti Islands and the Governor of Riau and the Ministry of Finance

“…This internal conflict in the autonomous region is caused by divided local government and differences in interests between the DKI Governor and the DKI Jakarta DPRD. However, this conflict can be resolved by involving the Ministry of Home Affairs with mediation efforts (Jumadin & Wibisono, 2021).…”

Interaction of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) with the Regional Government in the 2019 APBD Policy Formulation in Sidenreng Rappang Regency

“…Usually conflicts occur at the stage of seeking an agreement to be set up as a APBD, what happens is a tug of war between the local government and the DPRD (Jumadin & Wibisono, 2021). Thus, the interests of the regional government and DPRD will receive top priority because their interests can be fought for in the final stages.…”

Komunikasi Organisasi Pasca Pemilihan Walikota dan Wakil Walikota Periode 2013-2018 di Sekretariat Daerah Kota Gorontalo

“…Agustino (2009) memandang elit politik sebagai aktor politik yang aktif berpolitik (Pito et al, 2022). Dalam pandangan Varma (2010), menegaskan bahwa setidaknya masyarakat terbagi dalam dua kategori yang mencakup: pertama, sekelompok kecil manusia yang berkemampuan dan karenanya menduduki posisi untuk memerintah dan kedua, sejumlah besar massa yang ditakdirkan untuk diperintah (Jumadin & Wibisono, 2021). Konflik terjadi karena tidak ada konsensus antara pribadipribadi atau kelompok-kelompok didalam masyarakat.…”