Kooperation im ASD

Santen, Eric van; Seckinger, Mike

doi:10.2378/asda3.art30

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, we used previous descriptions of process and outcome variables in studies using instruments of cooperation and quality management within the youth welfare and healthcare sector cooperation (acc. [37–39]) to develop the instrument, which consisted of six topics (personal information, information about the case, and different sections in light of cooperation: professional attitude, case specific communication, case specific process, satisfaction with aspects of case specific cooperation). Experienced case responsible employees of YWO and CAP had been involved in the development process.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lastly, due to lack of established instruments and in view of the explorative approach of the present study, we used previous descriptions of process and outcome variables including instruments of cooperation and quality management within the youth welfare and healthcare sector (acc. [37–39]) to develop a questionnaire assessing the quality of cooperation. The different versions were optimized for clarity and comprehensibility by employees of YWO and CAP, but not validated in an extra study.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Come together: case specific cross-institutional cooperation of youth welfare services and child and adolescent psychiatry

Mack

Wanderer

Kölch

et al. 2019

Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Due to the increasing rate of children and families who require support from both youth welfare services and from mental health services, a solid cross-institutional cooperation is needed to provide coordinated and integrated help. Studies involving not only qualitative, but also quantitative information from both services regarding not only general, but also case specific views on cross-institutional cooperation and psychosocial needs are lacking. Methods Hence, we collected data from n = 96 children and families who received support from youth welfare office (YWO) and child and adolescents psychiatry (CAP) simultaneously. In a longitudinal survey, we assessed the evaluation of case specific cross-institutional cooperation and psychosocial needs by employees of YWO and CAP as well as descriptive data (including psychopathology of children) over a 6-month period. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to assess the effects of time and institution (YWO/CAP) on employees’ evaluation of case specific cross-institutional cooperation and psychosocial needs as well as children’s psychopathology. Results The data showed that generally YWO employees rated the case specific communication better than CAP employees. Furthermore, CAP employees estimated psychosocial needs higher than YWO employees did. The employees’ evaluation of total case specific cross-institutional cooperation did not differ between the employees of both institutions; it further did not change over time. The case specific evaluations did not correlate between the case responsible employees of YWO and CAP. Conclusion The data showed satisfaction with the case specific cross-institutional cooperation in general, but meaningful differences in case specific ratings between both institutions indicate the possibility and need for improvement in daily work and cooperation as well as in regulations and contractual agreements. The implementation of more exchange of higher quality and transparency will ensure smoother cross-institutional cooperation. Future research should pursue this topic to convey the need for further improvement in cross-institutional cooperation into decision-making processes and to evaluate the success of innovative projects in this field.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Come together: case specific cross-institutional cooperation of youth welfare services and child and adolescent psychiatry

Mack

Wanderer

Kölch

et al. 2019

Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Die Befunde deuten darauf hin, dass es im Hinblick auf Kooperationsqualität und -quantität vor allem die Institutionen innerhalb der Jugendhilfe sind, welche am besten und häufigsten miteinander kooperieren. Dieses Ergebnis reiht sich in die Erkenntnisse von van Santen & Seckinger [31] ein, welche im Rahmen einer Befragung von Jugendämtern zu Kooperationen im Arbeitsalltag berichteten, dass nur 11 % der Jugendämter regelmäßige Kooperationskontakte mit der EP angaben. Die Bewertungen bezüglich der EP sind einerseits im Vergleich zu den anderen Institutionen am ungünstigsten, gleichzeitig erscheinen die Bewertungen durch Mitarbeiter:innen aus der EP am wenigsten differenziert.…”

Section: Zusammenhang Zwischen Kooperationsqualität Und -Quantitätunclassified

Interinstitutionelle Kooperation der Jugendhilfe, der Kinder- und Jugendlichenpsychiatrie und der Erwachsenenpsychiatrie – Eine empirische Untersuchung

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungHilfen für Familien mit einem psychisch erkrankten Mitglied werden in Deutschland durch ein Konglomerat verschiedenster Hilfesysteme angeboten. Um die Vernetzung und Kooperation dieser interinstitutionellen Hilfesysteme zu verbessern ist es wichtig, ein vertieftes Verständnis über die bestehenden Kooperationsstrukturen zu erlangen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurden unterschiedliche qualitative und quantitative Aspekte mittels eines Fragebogens bei Teilnehmenden aus verschiedenen Hilfesystemen erhoben und analysiert. Die Ergebnisse weisen insbesondere auf die aktuell bestehende Sonderrolle der Erwachsenenpsychiatrie hin.

show abstract

“…Eine solche Überhöhung der Handlungsstrategie Kooperation hat häufig aber auch zur Folge, dass die damit verbundenen Konflikte, Risiken und Nebenwirkungen nicht kritisch reflektiert werden (vgl. van Santen & Seckinger 2012).…”

Section: Kooperation Und Konfliktunclassified

“…Kooperationen sind jedoch voraussetzungsvolle Handlungsstrategien (vgl. dazu van Santen & Seckinger 2012). Das Risiko, dabei zu scheitern oder Konflikte auszulösen, ist relativ groß.…”

Section: Kooperation Und Konfliktunclassified

Soziale Arbeit – Kernthemen und Problemfelder

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Kooperation im ASD

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Come together: case specific cross-institutional cooperation of youth welfare services and child and adolescent psychiatry

Come together: case specific cross-institutional cooperation of youth welfare services and child and adolescent psychiatry

Interinstitutionelle Kooperation der Jugendhilfe, der Kinder- und Jugendlichenpsychiatrie und der Erwachsenenpsychiatrie – Eine empirische Untersuchung

Soziale Arbeit – Kernthemen und Problemfelder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About