2004
DOI: 10.2172/901203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kootenai River Fisheries Investigations; Rainbow and Bull Trout Recruitment, 2002-2003 Annual Report.

Abstract: Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss provide the most important sport fishery in the Kootenai River, Idaho, but densities and catch rates are low. Low recruitment is one possible factor limiting the rainbow trout population. Bull trout Salvelinus confluentus also exist in the Kootenai River, but little is known about this population. Research reported here addresses the following objectives for the Kootenai River, Idaho: increase rainbow trout recruitment, identify rainbow and bull trout spawning tributaries and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2000, 2001; Paragamian 2002). Although the Rainbow Trout fishery was regarded as the most important sport fishery in the Idaho portion of the river (Paragamian 1995a; Walters 2003), post‐dam densities averaged only 50 fish/km (4.5 fish/ha) by the mid‐1990s (Paragamian 1995b; Downs 2000; Walters and Downs 2001) compared to similar regional rivers, which exhibited three‐ to fourfold greater densities (Spokane River; Bennett and Underwood 1988). Similar to Rainbow Trout, reductions in the densities of other native fish species, such as Mountain Whitefish Prosopium williamsoni , Largescale Suckers Catostomus macrocheilus , and Redside Shiner Richardsonius balteatus , were documented (Paragamian 2002; Hardy 2008).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000, 2001; Paragamian 2002). Although the Rainbow Trout fishery was regarded as the most important sport fishery in the Idaho portion of the river (Paragamian 1995a; Walters 2003), post‐dam densities averaged only 50 fish/km (4.5 fish/ha) by the mid‐1990s (Paragamian 1995b; Downs 2000; Walters and Downs 2001) compared to similar regional rivers, which exhibited three‐ to fourfold greater densities (Spokane River; Bennett and Underwood 1988). Similar to Rainbow Trout, reductions in the densities of other native fish species, such as Mountain Whitefish Prosopium williamsoni , Largescale Suckers Catostomus macrocheilus , and Redside Shiner Richardsonius balteatus , were documented (Paragamian 2002; Hardy 2008).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%