2015
DOI: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.2.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Korean Facial Emotion Recognition Tasks for Schizophrenia Research

Abstract: ObjectiveDespite the fact that facial emotion recognition (FER) tasks using Western faces should be applied with caution to non-Western participants or patients, there are few psychometrically sound and validated FER tasks featuring Easterners' facial expressions for emotions. Thus, we aimed to develop and establish the psychometric properties of the Korean Facial Emotion Identification Task (K-FEIT) and the Korean Facial Emotion Discrimination Task (K-FEDT) for individuals with schizophrenia.MethodsThe K-FEIT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, the effect size for correctly identifying a targeted emotion (“hit rate”) out of eight type dimensions in eight models in the Radboud Faces Database (RaFD) was η 2 = 0.47 ( Langner et al, 2010 ). In addition, in a previous study, mean differences in accuracy between Western and Eastern models’ fearful facial expressions were large ( t = 3.60, df = 45) ( Bahk et al, 2015 ). Given the large effect sizes observed in previous studies, we decided that 54 participants should provide sufficient power for 80% power assuming a 5% significance level and a two-sided test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous study, the effect size for correctly identifying a targeted emotion (“hit rate”) out of eight type dimensions in eight models in the Radboud Faces Database (RaFD) was η 2 = 0.47 ( Langner et al, 2010 ). In addition, in a previous study, mean differences in accuracy between Western and Eastern models’ fearful facial expressions were large ( t = 3.60, df = 45) ( Bahk et al, 2015 ). Given the large effect sizes observed in previous studies, we decided that 54 participants should provide sufficient power for 80% power assuming a 5% significance level and a two-sided test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These issues could result in difficulties when interpreting study results. For instance, even though it has been noted that fearful Korean facial expressions have markedly low consensus ratings ( Bahk et al, 2015 ), it is unclear whether this is the result of issues (e.g., deviations from the FACS) with stimuli, or with characteristics specific to Koreans (e.g., reduced sensitivity to fearful expressions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been validated for Korean (Bahk et al. , 2015 ) and Chinese (Lo and Siu, 2018 ) populations, but no normative data are currently available for the European and South American populations, which limits its clinical use. In contrast, the EK-60F has been validated in Korea (Kim et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1986 ; Kerr and Neale, 1993 ; Zuroff and Colussy, 1986 ), although normative data are currently available only for USA and Korean (Bahk et al. , 2015 ) populations. Another test is the Emotion Differentiation Task (EMODIFF; Kohler et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%