Dubbel 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-06778-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kraftfahrzeugtechnik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vehicle model dealt with in this paper incorporates elements of the tire dynamics as uncertainties. The brush tire model presented in [10] assumes a parabolic pressure distribution on the contact patch whose rubber dynamics has reached steady-state. Under such conditions, the lateral force for a given tire i becomes a direct function of the slip angle (α i ).…”
Section: Tire and Vehicle Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vehicle model dealt with in this paper incorporates elements of the tire dynamics as uncertainties. The brush tire model presented in [10] assumes a parabolic pressure distribution on the contact patch whose rubber dynamics has reached steady-state. Under such conditions, the lateral force for a given tire i becomes a direct function of the slip angle (α i ).…”
Section: Tire and Vehicle Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three categories of models capable of representing the tire dynamics on saturation situations: Finite element analysis [9] [11]; Empirical data approximation, such as the "Magic Tire Formula" [16]; and the dynamical approximation of the tire by a "brush" model, first proposed by Fiala [6]. The third technique, provides a good compromise between its ability to describe tires physical properties and its complexity, since it assumes that tires are always at steady state and tire transients are faster than chassis transients.…”
Section: Tire Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three categories of models capable of representing the tire dynamics on saturation situations: finite element analysis (HELNWEIN et al, 1993)-(KOISHI;KABE;SHIRATORI, 1998); empirical data approximation, such as the "Magic Tire Formula" (PACEJKA; BAKKER, 1992); and the dynamical approximation of the tire by a "brush" model, first proposed by Fiala (FIALA, 1987). The third technique provides a good compromise between its ability to describe tires physical properties and its complexity; since it assumes that tires are always at steady state and tire transients are faster than chassis transients.…”
Section: Tire Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%