2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21736-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KRAS drives immune evasion in a genetic model of pancreatic cancer

Abstract: Immune evasion is a hallmark of KRAS-driven cancers, but the underlying causes remain unresolved. Here, we use a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to inactivate KRAS by CRISPR-mediated genome editing. We demonstrate that at an advanced tumor stage, dependence on KRAS for tumor growth is reduced and is manifested in the suppression of antitumor immunity. KRAS-deficient cells retain the ability to form tumors in immunodeficient mice. However, they fail to evade the host immune system in syngeneic w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
133
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(124 reference statements)
4
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2019, we reported that KRAS mutant cancer cells with a gain-of-function p53 mutation can “educate” adjacent CAFs via short and long range NFκB/TNFα signalling, driving the establishment of a pro-metastatic and chemoresistant environment by secreting perlecan (a basement membrane protein) [ 29 ] ( Figure 2 b). Likewise, Novo et al, (2018) reported that pancreatic cancer cells with a mutant p53 phenotype can activate fibroblasts to be pro-invasive via exosomal secretion of a sialylated glycoprotein called podocalyxin (PODXL), while p53 null-derived exosomes could not [ 75 ] ( Figure 2 b). Strikingly, it was also shown that exosome-derived PODXL affects ECM organisation and remodeling in the lungs of mice enhancing metastatic colonization [ 75 ].…”
Section: Heterotypic Reciprocal Tumor-stroma Signalling Drives Pdac Development Progression and Therapy Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2019, we reported that KRAS mutant cancer cells with a gain-of-function p53 mutation can “educate” adjacent CAFs via short and long range NFκB/TNFα signalling, driving the establishment of a pro-metastatic and chemoresistant environment by secreting perlecan (a basement membrane protein) [ 29 ] ( Figure 2 b). Likewise, Novo et al, (2018) reported that pancreatic cancer cells with a mutant p53 phenotype can activate fibroblasts to be pro-invasive via exosomal secretion of a sialylated glycoprotein called podocalyxin (PODXL), while p53 null-derived exosomes could not [ 75 ] ( Figure 2 b). Strikingly, it was also shown that exosome-derived PODXL affects ECM organisation and remodeling in the lungs of mice enhancing metastatic colonization [ 75 ].…”
Section: Heterotypic Reciprocal Tumor-stroma Signalling Drives Pdac Development Progression and Therapy Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Novo et al, (2018) reported that pancreatic cancer cells with a mutant p53 phenotype can activate fibroblasts to be pro-invasive via exosomal secretion of a sialylated glycoprotein called podocalyxin (PODXL), while p53 null-derived exosomes could not [ 75 ] ( Figure 2 b). Strikingly, it was also shown that exosome-derived PODXL affects ECM organisation and remodeling in the lungs of mice enhancing metastatic colonization [ 75 ]. These studies demonstrate the influence of p53 mutational status on disease progression and therapeutic response further highlighting the heterogeneous nature and influence of different stromal populations on tumor behavior [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Heterotypic Reciprocal Tumor-stroma Signalling Drives Pdac Development Progression and Therapy Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Oncogenic KRAS is a key mediator of immune suppression in PDA. A recent study using scRNA-seq approaches and TCGA data analysis suggest greater immune infiltration in KRAS independent and KRAS-low tumors compared to KRAS dependent and KRAS-high groups ( 33 ). In this model, inactivation of mutant Kras in PDA cells did not affect their tumorigenic capacity, but led to failure to evade the host immune system ( 33 ).…”
Section: The Immunologically “Cold” Tme Is Modulated By Oncogenic Pathways In Pdamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study using scRNA-seq approaches and TCGA data analysis suggest greater immune infiltration in KRAS independent and KRAS-low tumors compared to KRAS dependent and KRAS-high groups ( 33 ). In this model, inactivation of mutant Kras in PDA cells did not affect their tumorigenic capacity, but led to failure to evade the host immune system ( 33 ). The authors determined that KRAS knockout (KO) PDA cells had a striking up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex I (MHC I) genes compared with KRAS intact control cells, underlying increased susceptibility to anti-tumor immunity.…”
Section: The Immunologically “Cold” Tme Is Modulated By Oncogenic Pathways In Pdamentioning
confidence: 99%