1994
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560030605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kringle‐kringle interactions in multimer kringle structures

Abstract: The crystal structure of a monoclinic form of human plasminogen kringle 4 (PGK4) has been solved by molecular replacement using the orthorhombic structure as a model and it has been refined by restrained least-squares methods to an R factor of 16.4% at 2.25 A resolution. The X-PLOR structure of kringle 2 of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PAK2) has been refined further using PROFFT (R = 14.5% at 2.38 A resolution). The PGK4 structure has 2 and t-PAK2 has 3 independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. There ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An HGF dimer, formed by noncovalent interactions between kringles 2 and 3 of the protein pair, has been suggested as the moiety that induces dimerization and activation of MET (29). This idea is supported by a report of nonconvalent kringle-kringle interactions (32). Although MSP and HGF have different primary receptor binding regions, they may have a similar structural basis for receptor activation by dimer formation through kringle interactions.…”
Section: Effect Of Msp Subunits On Msp-induced Cell Shapesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…An HGF dimer, formed by noncovalent interactions between kringles 2 and 3 of the protein pair, has been suggested as the moiety that induces dimerization and activation of MET (29). This idea is supported by a report of nonconvalent kringle-kringle interactions (32). Although MSP and HGF have different primary receptor binding regions, they may have a similar structural basis for receptor activation by dimer formation through kringle interactions.…”
Section: Effect Of Msp Subunits On Msp-induced Cell Shapesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Kringle 2 of molecule 1 could then accommodate a lysine residue from kringle 3 of molecule 2 (it could be either Lys,, or Lys,, , the only 2 Lys residues in the sequence of kringle 3) into its putative lysine-binding pocket and, vice versa, kringle 2 of molecule 2 could interact with a Lys residue from kringle 3 of molecule 1. This type of ligand-like binding interaction between kringles has been recently reported in t-PA kringle 2 crystals (Padmanabhan et al, 1994). The putative noncovalent HGF/SF homodimer might also be held through direct interactions between the serine proteinase domains of each molecule mediated by the catalytic cleft and/or the S1 pocket; this could accommodate residues, other than arginine, from the serine proteinase domain of one of the HGF/SF molecules.…”
Section: E Q H K M R M V L G V I V P G R --G C a I P N R P G I F V R supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Kringles are small structural elements (i.e., 60 amino acids) found in hundreds of proteins in the genome and usually mediate protein-protein interactions ( 18 ). In agreement with this knowledge, previous studies have proposed interactions between kringle-1 and kringle-2 with fVa and fXa during the assembly of the prothrombinase complex ( 19 , 20 ).…”
Section: Prothrombin Gene and Domain Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%