2014
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2013.781611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Krull Dimension and Classical Krull Dimension of Modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…semiprime) submodule. Many properties known for prime or semiprime ideals can be extended to prime or semiprime sumodules as it has been done in [1,[5][6][7]13,14]. Recall that a ring R is left Goldie, if R satisfies the ascending chain condition (acc) on left annihilators and has finite uniform dimension.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…semiprime) submodule. Many properties known for prime or semiprime ideals can be extended to prime or semiprime sumodules as it has been done in [1,[5][6][7]13,14]. Recall that a ring R is left Goldie, if R satisfies the ascending chain condition (acc) on left annihilators and has finite uniform dimension.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from[7, Proposition 3.4] that M is non M -singular.Remark 3.6. The proof (a)⇒(b) is almost the same as that in[7, Proposition 3.13] but the sentence of that Proposition is written with different hypotheses. Also, note that the proof (a)⇒(b) shows that M is essentially compressible in the sense of[13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b)⇒(a) Since M is projective in σ[M ] and semiprime, then M is retractable. It follows from[7, Proposition 3.4] that M is non M -singular.Remark 3.6. The proof (a)⇒(b) is almost the same as that in[7, Proposition 3.13] but the sentence of that Proposition is written with different hypotheses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%