Kuidas uurida keele kestlikkust?

Ģimene valodā un valoda ģimenē : Akadēmiķa Jāņa Endzelīna 151. dzimšanas dienas atcerei veltīta starptautiska zinātniska konference : tēzes

“…In contrast, others use a combination of Tatar, Estonian, and Russian because it's either easier for them to avoid hardships with translating or not to abandon discussion with non-Tatar members of the family. On the one hand, the findings of this work indicate that the decisions of households to communicate in the Tatar language with their elderly family members align with the research conducted by Ehala et al (2014) on language sustainability through generational language transmission. On the other hand, the parents who did not study in Estonian medium schools have expressed the necessity of enrolling in supplementary Estonian language courses to enhance their proficiency.…”

Extralinguistic arguments in 21st century language planning discourse: a “superdictionary” between language standardization from above and below

“…20 (8) This myth ["that there is a centrally planned more accurate and appropriate way of speaking and writing than our mother tongue"] is dangerous to Estonian as it suppresses speakers' initiative and ingenuity in the use and advancement of their language and deprives them of the responsibility that comes with it (AT 110522). 21 The causal schema towards an unwanted future, but also other examples from the text corpus belong to the discourses of language endangerment (see Koreinik 2011), which is not surprising given that concerns regarding the endangerment of Estonian have been voiced since the mid-1800s (Ehala et al 2014).…”