2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
117
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One drawback to the Huang et al analysis is that it cannot say whether the requirements of the Annex I designation were effective in inducing these countries to reduce emissions-a question that our analysis answers directly. Second, Achiele and Felbermayr [10] utilize a DiD approach to estimate the difference in CO 2 emissions, carbon 'footprints,' and the carbon embodied in imports for a set of 40 countries before and after ratification of the KP, which for some countries occurred before 2005. We distinguish our work from Achiele and Felbermayr by using a somewhat simpler empirical specification for a broader definition of emissions and a larger sample of countries.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One drawback to the Huang et al analysis is that it cannot say whether the requirements of the Annex I designation were effective in inducing these countries to reduce emissions-a question that our analysis answers directly. Second, Achiele and Felbermayr [10] utilize a DiD approach to estimate the difference in CO 2 emissions, carbon 'footprints,' and the carbon embodied in imports for a set of 40 countries before and after ratification of the KP, which for some countries occurred before 2005. We distinguish our work from Achiele and Felbermayr by using a somewhat simpler empirical specification for a broader definition of emissions and a larger sample of countries.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that the time variables are still statistically insignificant, suggesting that in the past 30 years there has been no significant decrease in earthquake fatalities worldwide after controlling for country characteristics. This finding suggests disaster mitigation has, by 24 In addition to weighting foreign knowledge by bilateral trade flows, we create alternative bilateral spatial weights following the approach in Aichele and Felbermayr (2012), which allows foreign knowledge stock to diminish with bilateral distances and increase with the origin country's population size. We still do not find any significant result using this measure.…”
Section: The Effect Of Foreign Knowledge Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work suggests, for instance, that democracy has a positive effect on the willingness of countries to commit to more ambitious environmental policies, but that the 'words-deeds' gap is particularly large for such political systems (e.g. Bättig and Bernauer, 2009; see also Aichele and Felbermayr, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%