2009
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1250169069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L 2-Betti numbers of plane algebraic curves

Abstract: Abstract. In [DJL07] it was shown that if A is an affine hyperplane arrangement in C n , then at most one of theis non-zero. We will prove an analogous statement for complements of any algebraic curve in C 2 . Furthermore we also recast and extend results of [LM06] in terms of L 2 -Betti numbers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this note we prove an analogous statement for complements of complex affine hypersurfaces in general position at infinity. Furthermore, we recast and extend to this higher-dimensional setting results of [FLM09,LM06] about L 2 -Betti numbers of plane curve complements. …”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this note we prove an analogous statement for complements of complex affine hypersurfaces in general position at infinity. Furthermore, we recast and extend to this higher-dimensional setting results of [FLM09,LM06] about L 2 -Betti numbers of plane curve complements. …”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similar invariants were defined and studied in [LM06,LM07] in the case of plane curves. Moreover, as noted in [FLM09], the higher-order degrees δ i,m (X) can be regarded as L 2 -Betti numbers of the infinite cyclic cover M X , so the results of this note characterize the Cochran-Harvey invariants as well. At this point we want to emphasize that the higher-order degrees of a space M , hence also the L 2 -Betti numbers of the infinite cyclic cover M , may as well be infinite, since M is not in general a finite CWcomplex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, it can be also derived by using the corresponding vanishing statement for the L 2 ‐Betti numbers of such complements, see [, Theorem 1.1]. Indeed, it follows from [, Proposition 2.4] that we have the identification: bifalse(MX;ξfalse)=bi(2)false(MX,ξ:π1(MX)Im(ξ)false)between the Novikov–Betti numbers and the L 2 ‐Betti numbers corresponding to ξ. However, to our knowledge, Novikov torsion numbers do not have such interpretation in terms of L 2 ‐invariants.…”
Section: Novikov Homology Of Complex Hypersurface Complementsmentioning
confidence: 98%