1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01457017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L 2 decay for the Navier-Stokes flow in halfspaces

Abstract: We use the following notations: U = L'(Dn), 1 < r < oo, denotes the usual Lebesgue space of scalar, as well as vector, functions defined on the halfspace D n. The norm of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
135
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
135
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…$||e^{-tA}a||_{2}\leq C(1+t)^{-\frac{n+2}{4}}$ , so the existence of a weak solution with decay property (3.14) is deduced in exactly the same way as in [1], The assumption implies $a\in L_{\sigma}^{q}$ for alll $<q\leq 2$ ;so Proposition 3.2 and (3.13) together imply $||e^{-tA}a||_{q}\leq C(1+t)^{-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{n}{2}(1-\frac{1}{q})}$ for all $1<q\leq 2$ . (3.15) By using this, we can deduce assertion (3.15) in astandard manner.…”
Section: Proposition 32 Impliesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…$||e^{-tA}a||_{2}\leq C(1+t)^{-\frac{n+2}{4}}$ , so the existence of a weak solution with decay property (3.14) is deduced in exactly the same way as in [1], The assumption implies $a\in L_{\sigma}^{q}$ for alll $<q\leq 2$ ;so Proposition 3.2 and (3.13) together imply $||e^{-tA}a||_{q}\leq C(1+t)^{-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{n}{2}(1-\frac{1}{q})}$ for all $1<q\leq 2$ . (3.15) By using this, we can deduce assertion (3.15) in astandard manner.…”
Section: Proposition 32 Impliesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Consider the Helmholtz decomposition ( We know (see [1]) that $-A_{r}$ generates abounded analytic semigroup $\{e^{-tA}\}_{t\geq 0}$ in $L_{\sigma}^{r}$ so that for each $a\in L_{\sigma^{\backslash }}^{r}$ the filnction $v(t)=(\uparrow'"\iota^{n}')=e^{-tA}a$ gives aunique so lution of (S) in $L_{\sigma}^{r}$ .…”
Section: Results For Flows In $\Mathbb{r}^{n}$mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the case d = ∞ the existence of the Helmholtz projection in (i) for instance is proved in [40]; assertion (ii) for the case of d = ∞ is obtained in [35]. We also refer to [8] Now we are in position to establish the Helmholtz decomposition of the space FM 0 (R n−1 , X p ). To be precise, we will show that…”
Section: The Linearized Ekman Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stokes solutions in R n + have also been derived in [17]. This solution formula have been used in the L q framework, mainly for 1 < q < ∞ (see [4,6], see also [2,3,8,15] for the L 1 or L ∞ estimates of the Stokes flow or its gradient). The solution formula in [16] has been used mainly for L ∞ framework (see [5,13,16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%