1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0399-077x(79)80006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L'Antibiogramme : Méthodes classiques et Méthodes automatisées

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-standardization of the inoculum could have a very important impact on the final result of the antibiotic susceptibility test, as heavy inoculum leads to smaller zone diameters and vice versa (8). Thabaut et al, (9) demonstrated that poor standardization of the inoculum resulted in a large variability in the diameters of the inhibition zones for the same bacterial strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-standardization of the inoculum could have a very important impact on the final result of the antibiotic susceptibility test, as heavy inoculum leads to smaller zone diameters and vice versa (8). Thabaut et al, (9) demonstrated that poor standardization of the inoculum resulted in a large variability in the diameters of the inhibition zones for the same bacterial strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antimicrobial tests of synthesized compounds 2a-e and 6a-e were evaluated against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli (Gram-negative bacteria) and then against Staphyloccocus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis (Gram-positive bacteria). The method used was the liquid medium micromethod performed in a Open Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 96-well plate [18]. The compounds were dissolved in sterile DMSO so that their concentration in the wells of column 12 was 256 µg/mL followed by a dilution range of order 2 in DMSO to obtain a concentration series of the sample solution (from 256 to 0.063 µg/mL).…”
Section: Antibacterial Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%