L'appartenance aux communautés inuit du Nunavik: un cas de réception de l'ordre juridique inuit?.

Grammond, Sébastien

doi:10.1017/s0829320100009595

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Agreement (section 3) divides the population of Nunavik into "beneficiaries" (who have come to be synonymous with Inuit) and non-beneficiaries (non-Inuit) (Grammond, 2008). For the purposes of wildlife management, the latter are further differentiated into "resident" and non-resident.…”

Section: Producing New Peoplementioning

confidence: 99%

Wildlife Management in Nunavik: Structures, Operations, and Perceptions Following the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement

Gombay¹

2019

ARCTIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Des lignes directrices et des pratiques exemplaires visant à faire participer les peuples autochtones des régions arctiques à la recherche biophysique sont publiées depuis les années 1990. Malgré ces lignes directrices, les scientifiques généraux ont toujours de la difficulté à créer des relations de travail efficaces avec les peuples autochtones et à les faire participer à leurs recherches. Nous avons fait face à cet enjeu quand nous avons visité trois collectivités de la côte ouest de l’Alaska pour étudier les événements climatiques percutants et la formation de « bermes de bouillie de glace » susceptibles de protéger les localités des ondes de tempête. Quand nous avons essayé de nouer des liens avec les résidents des diverses localités, nous avons constaté que les lignes directrices actuelles sont souvent utiles pour nous indiquer quoi faire (par exemple, elles mettent l’accent sur l’importance des communications face à face), mais les chercheurs doivent aussi penser à comment le faire (les compétences) et à comment se présenter (attributs personnels). Pour prouver aux Autochtones qu’ils valorisent et respectent leur culture, les chercheurs pourraient apprendre à employer du vocabulaire qui est compréhensible et qui tient compte d’une démarche de collaboration au lieu d’une démarche hiérarchique du sommet à la base. Il faudrait que nous soyons prêts à adapter nos emplois du temps et à aider la collectivité que nous visitons au lieu de nous concentrer seulement sur nos propres besoins. Il faudrait aussi considérer les avantages pour la collectivité et nous assurer que les résidents comprennent la recherche que nous faisons et soient satisfaits. Parmi les attributs nécessaires pour ces travaux de recherche, notons la curiosité, l’honnêteté, la sensibilisation aux besoins d’autrui, l’empathie, la flexibilité et l’ouverture d’esprit. Même si les compétences et les attributs dont il est question ici aident à combler l’écart entre les cultures, nous tenons à souligner qu’aucune formule particulière ne garantit le succès.

show abstract

Section: Producing New Peoplementioning

confidence: 99%

Wildlife Management in Nunavik: Structures, Operations, and Perceptions Following the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement

Gombay¹

2019

ARCTIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Various Indigenous peoples have thus secured the power to control e often based on 'customary' practices e who is given membership of their polity as citizens with differential rights (cf. Blackburn, 2009;Grammond, 2008;Palmater, 2011).…”

Section: Personhood Citizenship Subjectivity and Indigenous Peoplesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Grammond, 2008). As a result, not only do they risk becoming temporally frozen in 'custom', but also rigid codifications of custom can actually negate the more fluid framework within which it is conceived and enacted.…”

Section: Personhood Citizenship Subjectivity and Indigenous Peoplesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 For more details on beneficiary enrolment see Section 3 of the JBNQA & Complementary Agreement 18. See also Grammond (2008). 8 For information of the differential hunting and fishing rights of beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries see the JBNQA, Sections 24.3, 24.5, 24.6, and 24.8.…”

Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…10 It is beyond the scope of this paper to explore this definition in more detail, but since the JBNQA was first formulated, the rules defining beneficiary status in Nunavik have evolved with time to become increasingly restrictive so as to exclude non-Inuit. See Grammond (2008) for more discussion. 11 I stress that this is an ideal form.…”

Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

“There are mentalities that need changing”: Constructing personhood, formulating citizenship, and performing subjectivities on a settler colonial frontier

Gombay

2015

Political Geography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tSettler colonial nations are sites of legal pluralism in which encounters between differing constructions of citizenship are formulated. These can involve customary, differentiated, and universal modes of citizenship. But the relationships amongst these are problematic, as are the ways they play out in the performance of subjectivities. To understand these dynamics, we need to think about ideas of personhood that are at their root. Based on research in Nunavik, this article focuses on how, through wildlife management, notions of personhood are being legally codified, particularly in relation to property. It examines the degree to which official ideas of personhood coincide with Indigenous ones in the construction of citizenship, and considers how these combine with property relations in the performance of subjectivities. Enforcing state wildlife regulations has altered the moral codes that define what persons are and determine how they should interact with one another. This research underscores the contradictions that arise as a result of codifying notions of personhood and citizenship in the context of settler colonialism.

show abstract

Postcolonial Jurisprudence and the Pluralist Turn: From Making Space to Being in Place

Anker¹

2017

In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

L'appartenance aux communautés inuit du Nunavik: un cas de réception de l'ordre juridique inuit?.

Cited by 5 publications

References 15 publications

Wildlife Management in Nunavik: Structures, Operations, and Perceptions Following the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement

Wildlife Management in Nunavik: Structures, Operations, and Perceptions Following the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement

“There are mentalities that need changing”: Constructing personhood, formulating citizenship, and performing subjectivities on a settler colonial frontier

Postcolonial Jurisprudence and the Pluralist Turn: From Making Space to Being in Place

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About