1978
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.5205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L-aspartate: evidence for a role in cone photoreceptor synaptic transmission in the carp retina.

Abstract: A number of putative neurotransmitter substances and their antagonists were applied to the carp retina while intracellular recordings from L-type cone horizontal cells were made. Of all the substances tested, L-aspartate was found to be the most potent agent in depolarizing these horizontal cells in dark-adapted, partially light-adapted, and Co2+-treated retinas. Furthermore, DL-a-aminoadipate, an L-aspartate antagonist, blocked the effects of both the endogenous photoreceptor transmitter and exogenously appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

1979
1979
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is surprising that L-aspartate produced no change in the membrane potentials of solitary horizontal cells, since L-aspartate seems to depolarize horizontal cells in situ (Murakami et al 1972;Wu & Dowling, 1978;Ishida & Fain, 1981). Horizontal cells dissociated from carp retinas have also been found not to be depolarized by L-aspartate (Lasater & Dowling, 1982).…”
Section: Specificity Of L-glutamate As An Agonistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is surprising that L-aspartate produced no change in the membrane potentials of solitary horizontal cells, since L-aspartate seems to depolarize horizontal cells in situ (Murakami et al 1972;Wu & Dowling, 1978;Ishida & Fain, 1981). Horizontal cells dissociated from carp retinas have also been found not to be depolarized by L-aspartate (Lasater & Dowling, 1982).…”
Section: Specificity Of L-glutamate As An Agonistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that the transmitter operating at these synapses is L-aspartate, as discussed in our earlier papers, is supported by the finding that DL-a-aminoadipate blocks both L-aspartate-induced responses and the synaptic activation of carp retinal neurones. These cells are far less sensitive to L-glutamate than to L-aspartate (Wu & Dowling, 1978). Nevertheless, none of the endogenous acidic amino acids that have actions sensitive to NMDA antagonists, including several sulphur-containing amino acids in addition to L-glutamate and L-aspartate, can be ruled out in the case of the frog spinal cord.…”
Section: Antagonist Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies indicate that among the known transmitter candidates, L-aspartate (LAsp), L-glutamate (L-Glu), or both might function as transmitter for at least some photoreceptor cells. It has been known for some time that exogenously applied L-ASP or L-Glu causes depolarization of horizontal cells and off-center bipolars, while the on-center bipolars are hyperpolarized by these amino acids (Cervetto and MacNichol, 1972;Dowling and Ripps, 1972; Ishida and Fain, 198 1;Kondo and Toyoda, 1980;Murakami et al, 1972Murakami et al, , 1975 NegishiandDrujan, 1979; Shiellset al, 1981; Slaughter and Miller, 198 1;Wu and Dowling, 1978). Although these observations suggest that L-ASP or L-Glu is the photoreceptor transmitter, the results have been questioned, since relatively high (mM) concentrations of the amino acids were required to elicit significant responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%