1976
DOI: 10.1080/00071667608416290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L‐aspartic acid and urea supplementation of low‐protein layer diets1

Abstract: 1. Urea supplementation of low-protein (125 g/kg) conventional-type diets for layers, whether containing fish meal or not, did not appear advantageous. 2. Supplementation of the low-protein diet with aspartic acid did not affect egg production rate of efficiency. 3. Soyabean meal supplementation of the low-protein diet increased egg weight significantly whereas aspartic acid did not.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This failure was also apparent even at low doses of dietary urea (group I) used in the present work. Previous studies (Korregoy et al, 1970;Kagan and Balloun, 1976a;Okumura et al, 1976Okumura et al, , 1979 pointed to inability of chickens to utilize dietary urea in synthesis of amino acids. Urea as a dietary component provides no energy, minerals or vitamins (Loosli and McDonald, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failure was also apparent even at low doses of dietary urea (group I) used in the present work. Previous studies (Korregoy et al, 1970;Kagan and Balloun, 1976a;Okumura et al, 1976Okumura et al, , 1979 pointed to inability of chickens to utilize dietary urea in synthesis of amino acids. Urea as a dietary component provides no energy, minerals or vitamins (Loosli and McDonald, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%