2014
DOI: 10.4000/pratiques.2063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L’atelier d’écriture comme dispositif de diagnostic et de développement de la compétence scripturale : du centre de formations d’adultes à la classe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This aspect seems to be important for the relationship that students may have with writing. This also connects with other work (Colognesi & Lucchini, 2016b;Niwese & Bazile, 2014) that has highlighted the importance of the metascriptural dimension in the relationship with the written word.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This aspect seems to be important for the relationship that students may have with writing. This also connects with other work (Colognesi & Lucchini, 2016b;Niwese & Bazile, 2014) that has highlighted the importance of the metascriptural dimension in the relationship with the written word.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We are referring here to studies conducted on workshops based on the French model of recreational workshops. These studies pointed out the effects of this model on the construction of the writer-as-subject, namely providing reassurance, staging, and distancing of the writing process, bringing out skills that are traditionally undervalued in the school context, and improving written production, especially when rewriting is encouraged (Lafont, 1999;Lafont-Terranova, 2009Niwese, 2010;Niwese & Bazile, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elles précisent que le rapport à l'écrit -donc aussi à sa dimension écriture -« est le fruit d'interactions complexes et évolutives entre les sentiments éprouvés pour l'écrit par l'individu (dimension affective), les valeurs qu'il lui attribue (dimension axiologique), ses conceptions (dimension conceptuelle) […] les jugements sur ses pratiques liées à l'écrit (dimension praxéologique) » (p. 52). D'autres y ajoutent la capacité à verbaliser ses pratiques d'écriture (dimension métascripturale) Niwese et Bazile, 2014). Dabène (1991) rappelait déjà que définir un modèle didactique de la CS, à partir des « spécificités de la « matière » à enseigner » (p. 10), permet « d'établir un guidage théorisé de conduites didactiques » (ibid, p. 10).…”
Section: Rapport à L'écritureunclassified