L’EMDR dans le traitement de la douleur chronique

Mazzola, Alexandra; Calcagno, Marìa Lujàn; Goicochea, María Teresa; Pueyrredòn, Honorio; Leston, Jorge; Salvat, Fernando

doi:10.1891/1933-3196.4.3.e31

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(Arias Suarez et al, 2020 ; Brennstuhl et al, 2016 ; 2017a ; Gerhardt et al, 2016 ; Grant, 2000 ; Grant & Threlfo, 2002 ; Mazzola et al, 2010 ) (Arias Suarez et al, 2020 ; Mazzola et al, 2010 ) (Gerhardt et al, 2016 ) (Gerhardt et al, 2016 ) (Grant & Threlfo, 2002 ) (Arias Suarez et al, 2020 ; Mazzola et al, 2010 ) (Arias Suarez et al, 2020 ; Mazzola et al, 2010 ) (Brennstuhl et al, 2016 ; 2017a ) (Supplementary Table 4A). (Arias Suarez et al, 2020 ; Gerhardt et al, 2016 ) (Brennstuhl et al, 2016 )…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) treatment in the medical setting: a systematic review

Driessen,

Morsink,

Busschbach

et al. 2024

European Journal of Psychotraumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Literature points towards the potential benefits of the application of Eye Movement and Desensitization Processing (EMDR)-therapy for patients in the medical setting, with cancer and pain being among the domains it is applied to. The field of applying EMDR-therapy for patients treated in the medical setting has evolved to such an extent that it may be challenging to get a comprehensive overview. Objective: This systematic literature review aims to evaluate the use and effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in patients treated in the medical setting. Methods: We performed a literature search following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if the effectiveness of EMDR-therapy was assessed in adult patients treated in a medical setting. Excluded were patients exclusively suffering from a mental health disorder, without somatic comorbidity. A risk of bias analysis was performed. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022325238). Results: Eighty-seven studies, of which 26 (pilot)-RCTs were included and categorized in 14 medical domains. Additionally, three studies focusing on persistent physical complaints were included. Most evidence exists for its application in the fields of oncology, pain, and neurology. The overall appraisal of these studies showed at least moderate to high risks of bias. EMDR demonstrated effectiveness in reducing symptoms in 85 out of 87 studies. Notably, the occurrence of adverse events was rarely mentioned. Conclusions: Overall, outcomes seem to show beneficial effects of EMDR on reducing psychological and physical symptoms in patients treated in a medical setting. Due to the heterogeneity of reported outcomes, effect sizes could not be pooled. Due to the high risk of bias of the included studies, our results should be interpreted with caution and further controlled high-quality research is needed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) treatment in the medical setting: a systematic review

Driessen,

Morsink,

Busschbach

et al. 2024

European Journal of Psychotraumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bilateral alternative stimulation (BAS) is a visual technique mainly applied during a psychotherapeutic approach called eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment ( 139 , 147 ), although growing evidence tends to highlight possible applications of EMDR to relieve pain in patients living with acute or chronic painful conditions ( 44 , 80 , 130 , 131 , 42 , 114 ).…”

Section: Sensory Stimulimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, nine weekly sessions of 1 h of EMDR can effectively decrease pain levels and their affect, as well as increase pain control in patients suffering from chronic pain for at least 6 months ( 44 ). In 38 patients living with chronic pain, it has been shown that 12 weekly EMDR sessions of 90 min were able to significantly decrease the amount of medication needed and to improve the quality of life (e.g., pain, physical activity, vitality, social interaction, emotional management) ( 80 ).…”

Section: Sensory Stimulimentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensory stimulations potentializing digital therapeutics pain control

Fougère,

Greco-Vuilloud,

Arnous

et al. 2023

Front. Pain Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the past two decades, using Digital Therapeutics (DTx) to counter painful symptoms has emerged as a novel pain relief strategy. Several studies report that DTx significantly diminish pain while compensating for the limitations of pharmacological analgesics (e.g., addiction, side effects). Virtual reality (VR) is a major component of the most effective DTx for pain reduction. Notably, various stimuli (e.g., auditory, visual) appear to be frequently associated with VR in DTx. This review aims to compare the hypoalgesic power of specific stimuli with or without a VR environment. First, this review will briefly describe VR technology and known elements related to its hypoalgesic effect. Second, it will non-exhaustively list various stimuli known to have a hypoalgesic effect on pain independent of the immersive environment. Finally, this review will focus on studies that investigate a possible potentialized effect on pain reduction of these stimuli in a VR environment.

show abstract

L’EMDR dans le traitement de la douleur chronique

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) treatment in the medical setting: a systematic review

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) treatment in the medical setting: a systematic review

Sensory stimulations potentializing digital therapeutics pain control

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About