L'engagement dans des collectifs de production de connaissance en ligne

Jullien, Nicolas; Roudaut, Karine; Squin, Sandrine Le

doi:10.3917/rfse.008.0059

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Theoretical analyses of incentives, in software projects (Foray and Zimmermann, 2001;Lerner and Tirole, 2002) or in wikis (Forte and Bruckman (2005), using Latour and Woolgar's (1979) analysis of science "cycles of credit"), estimate that the other main vector for participation, beside being able to have feedbacks and improvements on the pieces of knowledge proposed, is the quest for reputation. Applied works on Wikipedia (Nov, 2007;Yang and Lai, 2010;Zhang and Zhu, 2011), professional electronic networks (Wasko and Faraj, 2005;Jullien et al, 2011), and open source software (Shah, 2006;Scacchi, 2007), confirm that peer recognition, whether it be professional or community recognition, is a main motive for contribution amongst the main contributors, in addition to intrinsic factors (personal enjoyment and satisfaction from helping by sharing their knowledge).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 94%

Social Interactions vs Revisions, What is Important for Promotion in Wikipedia?

2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In epistemic community, people are said to be selected on their knowledge contribution to the project (articles, codes, etc.) However, the socialization process is an important factor for inclusion, sustainability as a contributor, and promotion. Finally, what does matter to be promoted? being a good contributor? being a good animator? knowing the boss? We explore this question looking at the process of election for administrator in the English Wikipedia community. We modeled the candidates according to their revisions and/or social attributes. These attributes are used to construct a predictive model of promotion success, based on the candidates's past behavior, computed thanks to a random forest algorithm.Our model combining knowledge contribution variables and social networking variables successfully explain 78% of the results which is better than the former models. It also helps to refine the criterion for election. If the number of knowledge contributions is the most important element, social interactions come close second to explain the election. But being connected with the future peers (the admins) can make the difference between success and failure, making this epistemic community a very social community too.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 94%

Social Interactions vs Revisions, What is Important for Promotion in Wikipedia?

2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, as these over-users become adept at a task, they begin using the rules as means of protecting their own production, and thus serve to continue stimulating their own contributions. Mastering the administrative process becomes a type of selective incentive which works in tandem with accumulating work capital to further cultivate uneven contributions across the board (Jullien, Roudaut, & Squin, 2011).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution of Online Co-Production Groups and Its Effects on Content Quality

Matei¹,

Jullien²,

Rezgui

et al. 2019

SSRN Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What types of social processes generate strong online co-production groups? How do these groups evolve to reach peak performance? How does the quality of the products generated by the groups co-vary with the evolution of their social systems over time? The paper analyzes the entire English and French Wikipedia editorial histories, from their inception until 2015, identifying the specific phases through which two different massive online production systems grew. By tracking the emergence of the high contribution group across two different online spaces on a fine-grained level, the paper uncovers their temporal evolutions and impacts on the organization of social systems. Furthermore, the paper reveals how the quality of the content coevolves with the emergence of the production groups through each growth phase.

show abstract

“…Signe d'une injonction paradoxale des entreprises qui, d'un côté, voient dans le Web relationnel un moyen de favoriser des situations sociales et organisationnelles nouvelles au travail (Beaudouin et al, 2001 ;Muhlmann, 2001 ;Mallard, 2014) -par la mise en relation de ses employés -, en développant des communautés de pratiques, mais, d'un autre côté, tiennent à préserver leurs frontières organisationnelles. On sait en effet que les personnes s'impliquent dans ces communautés parce qu'elles ont des objectifs personnels, des besoins auxquels celles-ci répondent (Jullien et al, 2011). Le développement de liens sociaux arrive en sus.…”

Section: Corpus Et Méthodes D'enquêteunclassified

Les usages des outils de réseau social par des salariés : Des registres privés et professionnels individualisés

Roudaut¹,

Jullien²

2017

terminal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technologie de l'information, culture & société Résumés Français English Cet article sur les usages des outils de réseau social par les salariés s'inscrit dans une tradition de recherche sur les effets de la technologie sur le travail, sur l'évolution des frontières vie privée et vie professionnelle. Il questionne la façon dont ils gèrent leurs identités (privée, publique, professionnelle, personnelle). Menée dans une grande entreprise française du secteur des TIC, l'enquête-quantitative et qualitative-souligne premièrement, l'existence d'une conscience forte du caractère professionnel et privé de ces outils ; deuxièmement, un usage spécifique des plateformes : une tentative de cloisonnement. Le mélange des usages des outils est à l'image de l'entrelacement des sociabilités dans la vie hors ligne. This article addresses the question of employees' perceived usefulness of social networking sites in their professional activity. The quantitative and qualitative survey conducted in a large French company from the ICT sector, shows a low level professional use of online social sites. We identify two types of users, associated with types of use and types of networks. If the users creates the usage, it is individualized and disaffiliated from the company.

show abstract

L'engagement dans des collectifs de production de connaissance en ligne

Abstract: Jullien Nicolas et al., « L'engagement dans des collectifs de production de connaissance en ligne » Le cas GeoRezo,

Cited by 13 publications

References 25 publications

Social Interactions vs Revisions, What is Important for Promotion in Wikipedia?

Social Interactions vs Revisions, What is Important for Promotion in Wikipedia?

The Evolution of Online Co-Production Groups and Its Effects on Content Quality

Les usages des outils de réseau social par des salariés : Des registres privés et professionnels individualisés

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About