2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L -estimates for the square root of elliptic systems with mixed boundary conditions

Abstract: This article focuses on L p -estimates for the square root of elliptic systems of second order in divergence form on a bounded domain. We treat complex bounded measurable coefficients and allow for mixed Dirichlet/Neumann boundary conditions on domains beyond the Lipschitz class. If there is an associated bounded semigroup on L p 0 , then we prove that the square root extends for all p ∈ (p0, 2) to an isomorphism between a closed subspace of W 1,p carrying the boundary conditions and L p . This result is sharp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(101 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• [38]: second order elliptic systems in divergence form on bounded Lipschitz domains, with L ∞ coefficients and mixed boundary conditions. • [76]: Stokes operator on a Lipschitz domain • [79]: Dirichlet Laplace operator on C 2 -domains with weights • [86]: Hodge Laplacian and Stokes operator with Hodge boundary conditions on very weakly Lipschitz domains One advantage of the above approach is that it leads to an L p ( × (0, T ); L q )-theory for all p ∈ (2, ∞) and q ∈ [2, ∞) (where in case q = 2, the case p = 2 is included), and gives optimal space-time regularity results such as U ∈ L p ( ; H θ, p (0, T ; X 1−θ )) or even U ∈ L p ( ; C([0, T ]; X 1− 1 p , p )), where we used complex and real interpolation space respectively.…”
Section: The Role Of the H ∞ -Calculus Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• [38]: second order elliptic systems in divergence form on bounded Lipschitz domains, with L ∞ coefficients and mixed boundary conditions. • [76]: Stokes operator on a Lipschitz domain • [79]: Dirichlet Laplace operator on C 2 -domains with weights • [86]: Hodge Laplacian and Stokes operator with Hodge boundary conditions on very weakly Lipschitz domains One advantage of the above approach is that it leads to an L p ( × (0, T ); L q )-theory for all p ∈ (2, ∞) and q ∈ [2, ∞) (where in case q = 2, the case p = 2 is included), and gives optimal space-time regularity results such as U ∈ L p ( ; H θ, p (0, T ; X 1−θ )) or even U ∈ L p ( ; C([0, T ]; X 1− 1 p , p )), where we used complex and real interpolation space respectively.…”
Section: The Role Of the H ∞ -Calculus Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An independent interest in Theorem 1 stems from its immediate consequences for the harmonic analysis of L on L q (O), such as H ∞ -calculus, Riesz transforms and Kato square root estimates, at least when O is either the whole space or a bounded connected set that is Lipschitz regular around the Neumann boundary part. Indeed, such results come for free once the extrapolation of the semigroup has been settled and we refer the reader to [3,9] for a precise account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumptions Ω c and D are satisfied, the same estimate holds for all p ∈ [2, 2 + ε), where ε > 0 is as in Theorem 3.4(b). Moreover, there exists a C > 0 such that In [25], Egert proved under the assumptions that Ω is a d-set and D a (d − 1)-set that there exists an ε > 0 such that for all numbers p that satisfy (15) or (13) the operator A…”
Section: If In Additionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isomorphism property of (25) is deduced in [4] for real coefficient functions µ, while in his pioneering paper [25] Egert succeeded to prove the isomorphy (25) for complex coefficient functions (and even for systems) as long as the corresponding semigroup is well-behaved on L p (Ω). In order to go into details, we quote and apply the results from [25] that are relevant for our purposes. In all what follows, for a given coefficient function µ and p ∈ ( p 0 (µ)d d(p 0 (µ)−1)+2 , p 0 (µ)d d−2 ) we denote by A µ p the operator corresponding to µ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation