L’interrogation dans un corpus de français parlé en Acadie. Formes de la question et visées de l’interrogation

Arrighi, Laurence

doi:10.4000/linx.277

Cited by 17 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Yet, a probe into individuals shows that while speakers may all converge in producing the following three grammatical options to express direct yes-no questions, these constructions do not have the same distribution nor do they have the same status (cf. Arrighi, 2007;Dagnac, 2013).…”

Section: Variation Within and Across Individualsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons From Neuro-(a)-Typical Brains: Universal Multilingualism, Code-Mixing, Recombination, and Executive Functions

Aboh

2020

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the literature, the term code-mixing/switching refers to instances of language mixing in which speakers/signers combine properties of two or more languages in their utterances. Such a linguistic behavior is typically discussed in the context of multilinguals, and experts commonly focus on the form of language mixing/switching and its cross-linguistic commonalities. Not much is known, however, about how the knowledge of code-mixing comes about. How come any speaker/signer having access to more than one externalization channel (spoken or signed) code-mixes spontaneously? Likewise, why do both neurotypical speakers/signers and certain neuro-atypical speakers/signers produce structurally similar mixing types? This paper offers some answers to these questions arguing that the cognitive process underlying code-mixing is a basic property of the human learning device: recombination, a fully automated cognitive process. Recombination is innate: it allows learners to select relevant linguistic features from heterogeneous inputs, and recombine them into new syntactic objects as part of their mental grammars whose extensions, arguably individual idiolects, represents what Aboh (2015b, 2019a,b) characterizes as hybrid grammars.

show abstract

Section: Variation Within and Across Individualsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons From Neuro-(a)-Typical Brains: Universal Multilingualism, Code-Mixing, Recombination, and Executive Functions

Aboh

2020

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What is the origin of the Romance languages and how did they evolve? When and how did they become different from Latin, and from each other? Volume 2 of The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages offers fresh and original reflections on the principal questions and issues in the comparative external histories of the Romance languages. It is organised around the two key themes of influences and institutions, exploring the fundamental influence, of contact with and borrowing from, other languages (including Latin), and the cultural and institutional forces at work in the establishment of standard languages and norms of correctness. A perfect complement to the first volume, it offers an external history of the Romance languages combining data and theory to produce new and revealing perspectives on the shaping of the Romance languages.

show abstract

Introduction

2013

The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

L’interrogation dans un corpus de français parlé en Acadie. Formes de la question et visées de l’interrogation

Cited by 17 publications

References 9 publications

Lessons From Neuro-(a)-Typical Brains: Universal Multilingualism, Code-Mixing, Recombination, and Executive Functions

Lessons From Neuro-(a)-Typical Brains: Universal Multilingualism, Code-Mixing, Recombination, and Executive Functions

The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages

Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About