1997
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/30/4/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L subshell and total M shell x-ray production cross sections of Hg for protons of energy 0.7 - 2.9 MeV

Abstract: X-ray production cross sections of individual L lines, L and M total of Hg were measured for 0.7 to 2.9 MeV protons. The experimental results were compared with the theoretical predictions of the plane wave Born approximation (PWBA), ECPSSR and the semiempirical formula of Orlic. Good agreements were obtained for L1 at lower energies and L2 and L3 at higher energies with Orlic and ECPSSR predictions, respectively. The influence of using different databases for x-ray fluorescence yields and Coster-Kronig transi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, as well as the few existing data from other laboratories (Barros Leite et al 1977, Budnar et al 1984, Amirabadi et al 1997, are compared with the theoretical predictions by plotting the ratios between the experimental (σ exp ) and the predicted (σ th ) cross sections versus the relativistic reduced velocity parameter ξ R L . Data reported on production cross sections (Amirabadi et al 1997) have been converted to ionization cross sections by making use of the same procedure and the same parameters used for our own data, in order to compare with the other data treated in the same way. Leite et al (1977); •, Budnar et al (1984); , Amirabadi et al (1997).…”
Section: Cross Section Valuesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our results, as well as the few existing data from other laboratories (Barros Leite et al 1977, Budnar et al 1984, Amirabadi et al 1997, are compared with the theoretical predictions by plotting the ratios between the experimental (σ exp ) and the predicted (σ th ) cross sections versus the relativistic reduced velocity parameter ξ R L . Data reported on production cross sections (Amirabadi et al 1997) have been converted to ionization cross sections by making use of the same procedure and the same parameters used for our own data, in order to compare with the other data treated in the same way. Leite et al (1977); •, Budnar et al (1984); , Amirabadi et al (1997).…”
Section: Cross Section Valuesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The database used for this study originates with the data compiled in in Refs 1–3. With additional references 4–8 that were not cited in these compilations and the subsequently published data,9–32 a total of 29 papers was found, including several that presented the results only in graphical form 4–8. The graphs from these papers were digitized and the values extracted in tabular form, although a higher uncertainty in these values should be expected.…”
Section: Previous Database and Its Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Number of L ‐subshell ionization and the individual x‐ray line cross sections as previously compiled1–3 and currently updated 4–32…”
Section: Previous Database and Its Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the impact of protons and nickel ions, M shell X-ray production crosssection of Pb was measured [15]. Also, M shell cross-sections of Hg [16], Au and Bi [17,18] were reported where the experimental parameters were measured in different energy ranges. L Xray production cross-sections for Zr, Nb, Mo, Ag, Cd, In, Sn and M X-ray production cross-sections for Au, Pb, Th, U [19] and for five elements in the range 81 Z  92 were measured at 5.96 keV energy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%