2010
DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccq047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L1 to teach L2: complexities and contradictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
77
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Or it may be that they were against L1 use for no particular reason; only believing that an L1 ban is beneficial for the students. The present study also suggests that non-native teachers prefer to use L1 in particular instances such as when giving instructions to the students, which is in line with the findings of Al-Buraki (2008), Copland andNeokleaous (2011), andSampson (2011), when defining new vocabulary as in Campa and Nassaji (2009), when explaining difficult topics similar to the findings of Copland andNeokleaous (2011), andGulzar (2010), and for socializing in the classrooms as in Burden (2000).…”
Section: Non-native Efl Teachers' Perceptions On L1 Use In L2 Classroomssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Or it may be that they were against L1 use for no particular reason; only believing that an L1 ban is beneficial for the students. The present study also suggests that non-native teachers prefer to use L1 in particular instances such as when giving instructions to the students, which is in line with the findings of Al-Buraki (2008), Copland andNeokleaous (2011), andSampson (2011), when defining new vocabulary as in Campa and Nassaji (2009), when explaining difficult topics similar to the findings of Copland andNeokleaous (2011), andGulzar (2010), and for socializing in the classrooms as in Burden (2000).…”
Section: Non-native Efl Teachers' Perceptions On L1 Use In L2 Classroomssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Schweers (1999) further argued that there were pedagogical as well as affective factors contributing to L1 use in the L2 classroom. Nevertheless, Copland and Neokleous (2011) stated that "decisions about when to use L1 and L2 are complex and seem to be based on both affective and cognitive factors" (p. 6). They elaborated that in terms of affective factors, teachers responded to their students' contributions, whatever language they used, in what seemed to be an effort to create a stress-free learning environment.…”
Section: Affective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contradiction is compounded by the apparent disparity between teachers' stated beliefs and their actual classroom practices. Copland and Neokleous (2011) concluded that teachers' desires about L1 use were clearly in conflict with their classroom practice. Researchers on L1 use have long been aware of this contradiction in professional behavior which has led many EFL teachers to feelings of guilt (Copland & Neokleous, 2011), frustration (Cianflone, 2009), or professional inadequacy (Cook, 2013).…”
Section: Teachers' Attitudes Toward Using L1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do this often with feelings of guilt, unprofessionalism and subterfuge (Butzkamm 2003;Canagarajah 2011;Copland and Neokleous 2011). Cook (2001: 410) argues that it is important to give teachers 'absolution for using the L1', encouraging methods which make positive use of the L1 in the language classroom, rather than seeing it as a regrettable fact of life which must be endured.…”
Section: Re-thinking the Monolingual Principlementioning
confidence: 99%