The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781351164085-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L2 Pragmatic Development in Study Abroad Settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research exploring the effects of 'study abroad' (SA) experiences on L2 development has usually found that learners tend to improve their L2 competence after the SA period (see Llanes 2020 for a review). Similar findings have been reported for L2 pragmatic learning (e.g., Barron 2019;Pérez-Vidal and Shively 2019). However, it has been claimed that when it comes to pragmatic development, not only the amount of exposure seems to be an important factor to consider, but also the pragmatic forms to be learned, the opportunity to interact with learners with a variety of social distance and power, the contextual situations they find themselves immersed in, or even their own individual differences (Taguchi 2015;Sánchez-Hernández and Alcón-Soler 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Research exploring the effects of 'study abroad' (SA) experiences on L2 development has usually found that learners tend to improve their L2 competence after the SA period (see Llanes 2020 for a review). Similar findings have been reported for L2 pragmatic learning (e.g., Barron 2019;Pérez-Vidal and Shively 2019). However, it has been claimed that when it comes to pragmatic development, not only the amount of exposure seems to be an important factor to consider, but also the pragmatic forms to be learned, the opportunity to interact with learners with a variety of social distance and power, the contextual situations they find themselves immersed in, or even their own individual differences (Taguchi 2015;Sánchez-Hernández and Alcón-Soler 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Pragmatic competence is generally considered to cover two subcomponents: pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics (Thomas 1983;Xiao 2015;Pérez Vidal and Shively 2019). The former focuses on the speaker's knowledge of the pragmatic function of a linguistic form in interaction, while the latter focuses on the ability to express, linguistically, the taking into account of context, relationships between the participants, their degree of shared knowledge, and social rules and norms (Delahaie 2015, p. 4).…”
Section: Discursive Functions and Development Of Pragmatic Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on the acquisition of sociolinguistic competence during SA has primarily focused on interlanguage pragmatics or the acquisition of "those aspects of language that cannot be considered in isolation from its use, language in its situational context" (Isabelli-García et al, 2018, p. 456). The results from these studies generally support the role of SA in the development of interlanguage pragmatics (Bataller, 2010;Iwasaki, 2010;Kinginger & Farrell, 2004;Lafford, 1995Lafford, , 2004Marriott, 1995), although most L2 learners demonstrate only incipient or partial acquisition of the pragmatic constraints on language use (see Pérez Vidal & Shively, 2019, for a review). Additionally, research on focused pragmatics instruction has demonstrated a positive correlation between predeparture instruction and the development of pragmatic awareness and competence during SA (Shively, 2011), as well as the effectiveness of concept-based pragmatic instruction (van Compernolle & Henery, 2014) in raising sociopragmatic competence that is recontextualizable to the situations that learners may encounter in the TL community.…”
Section: The Impact Of Study Abroad: Sociolinguistic Competencementioning
confidence: 53%