2002
DOI: 10.1007/s101080200039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PEA approximates the household's conditional expectations with a parametric function that includes an interaction component, which captures the concavity of the household's Euler equation. According to Barañano et al (2002), this approach reproduces the effect of the utility function's curvature more accurately than a log linear approach. We can also determine {λ N R t+1 , R N R t+1 } by solving for the household's expectations conditional on the normal growth scenario.…”
Section: C1 Solution Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEA approximates the household's conditional expectations with a parametric function that includes an interaction component, which captures the concavity of the household's Euler equation. According to Barañano et al (2002), this approach reproduces the effect of the utility function's curvature more accurately than a log linear approach. We can also determine {λ N R t+1 , R N R t+1 } by solving for the household's expectations conditional on the normal growth scenario.…”
Section: C1 Solution Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function includes an interaction component, which captures the concavity of the household's Euler equation. According to Bara ñano et al (2002), this approach reproduces the effect of the utility function's curvature more accurately than a log linear approach. We can also determine {λ N R t+1 , R N R t+1 } by solving for the household's expectations conditional on the normal growth scenario.…”
Section: Good Market Clearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NL EPU would be more suitable for the Dutch dataset, however it began in 2003. As the period 2003-2007 was excluded due to inconsistencies in the questionnaire, the regression with NL EPU covers only 2008-2018 whereas the regression withEU EPU covers 1997- 2002and 2008 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%