2020
DOI: 10.14201/zephyrus202086219238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La Antropología Dental como herramienta para el estudio de poblaciones megalíticas: primeros resultados de su aplicación al dolmen de La Cabaña (Burgos)

Abstract: El estudio antropológico de los osarios megalíticos se ve frecuentemente obstaculizado por la excesiva fragmentación y desconexión anatómica de los restos óseos, lo cual supone un impedimento a la hora de realizar caracterizaciones poblacionales fiables. Por esta razón, la dentición se presenta como una fuente de estudio viable debido a una mejor conservación frente a otros elementos esqueléticos, ofreciendo además información valiosa acerca de los modos de vida de poblaciones antiguas. Los datos obtenidos en … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the dolmen of La Cabaña, the first anthropological study established a minimum of 13 individuals (Etxeberría, 1989). A second study has obtained equivalent results, with an MNI of 13 individuals based on the cranial skeleton and 17 based on the post‐cranial skeleton, including 13 adults and four non‐adults, with a slight predominance of males over females (Santa Cruz del Barrio, 2020). Interesting taphonomic marks are also seen in this assemblage, which motivated a more detailed study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the case of the dolmen of La Cabaña, the first anthropological study established a minimum of 13 individuals (Etxeberría, 1989). A second study has obtained equivalent results, with an MNI of 13 individuals based on the cranial skeleton and 17 based on the post‐cranial skeleton, including 13 adults and four non‐adults, with a slight predominance of males over females (Santa Cruz del Barrio, 2020). Interesting taphonomic marks are also seen in this assemblage, which motivated a more detailed study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%