2016
DOI: 10.3917/bupsy.542.0117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La compréhension de l’intention d’autrui est-elle sous l’influence d’un biais négatif ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the CI participants and their hearing controls exhibited the same pattern of processing, giving fewer prosody-based responses when the prosody was embedded in a discrepant context than when it was on its own, and giving more prosody-based responses when the prosody was negative than when it was positive. With the same computerized paradigm (Aguert et al, 2010), in recent studies (Laval, Dardier, Laval, & Monetta, 2016;Aguert et al, 2010;Le Sourn-Bissaoui et al, 2013) negative bias and contextual bias seems to be a consistent result observed across different age groups (adults vs. children) and in both, typical and atypical development. Our study, using the same procedure and the same computerized paradigm, seems to provide the first evidence for the existence of this contextual and negative bias in a CI population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Moreover, the CI participants and their hearing controls exhibited the same pattern of processing, giving fewer prosody-based responses when the prosody was embedded in a discrepant context than when it was on its own, and giving more prosody-based responses when the prosody was negative than when it was positive. With the same computerized paradigm (Aguert et al, 2010), in recent studies (Laval, Dardier, Laval, & Monetta, 2016;Aguert et al, 2010;Le Sourn-Bissaoui et al, 2013) negative bias and contextual bias seems to be a consistent result observed across different age groups (adults vs. children) and in both, typical and atypical development. Our study, using the same procedure and the same computerized paradigm, seems to provide the first evidence for the existence of this contextual and negative bias in a CI population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This alienation corresponds to the subjective point of view of the adolescent and thus refers to her or his interpretation of the behaviors of others toward her or him. One can imagine that self‐esteem of good quality reduces a cognitive bias of negativity that would lead to attributing significant weight to the negative aspects perceived in the environment and to the evaluation of others' points of view as being necessarily negative, which would have as a consequence for the individual concerned the generation of ruminations and health disorders, including depressive symptoms (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Finkenauer & Vohs, 2001; Laval, Dardier, Laval & Laura, 2016). Based on these data, it would be interesting to conduct future studies to clarify the role of self‐esteem in the relationship between negativity bias, intention inferences to others, perspective taking, social modeling, experience of loneliness, ostracism, communication skills, and their effects on psychological well‐being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%