La cooperación Sur-Sur de Brasil, Chile y Venezuela: interés y pérdida de esencia

Brun, Élodie

doi:10.24241/rcai.2018.120.3.171

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, accessing complete and coherent public sources for different countries is extremely difficult. As Brun (2018) points out, this can be explained in part by political and administrative reasons, either the lack of a unit that coordinates these actions or because, even where they exist, they do not monopolise cooperation activities and/or compile all information publicly and on an ongoing basis. Consequently, the phenomenon often lacks a global vision (Ayllon and Leite, 2010), meaning that many of the qualitative studies tend to focus on case studies, which are limited in scope to the specific examples studied and are most certainly not exhaustive.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Development Cooperation and Dependency: An Analysis of Brazilian‐Spanish Cooperation in Latin America Between 2010 and 2018

Palacios‐Cívico,

Maestro‐Yarza,

Martí‐González

2023

Bull Latin American Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on analysis of Brazilian‐Spanish cooperation in Latin America, this article aims to contribute to the discussion on whether South–South Cooperation (SSC) represents an alternative model with specific and differentiated objectives, or if it largely reproduces the constraints and interests traditionally associated with the North–South model, but with new institutions and actors. We start by analysing the main criticisms levelled at cooperation in the literature, emphasising the identification, review and comparison of the mechanisms of domination and dependency that derive from the bilateral and multilateral practices of traditional development cooperation. We then construct a synthetic dependency index to measure the ability of Spain and Brazil – as representative cases of North–South Cooperation (NSC) and SSC with Latin America – to influence the foreign trade, investment and foreign policy decisions of aid recipients, and to empirically contrast the lower level of verticality that much of the available literature assumes about SSC schemes. The empirical analysis suggests significant differences between NSC and SSC in terms of their ability to reproduce dependency patterns and validate the discourse that tends to identify the latter as an alternative cooperation model.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%