2021
DOI: 10.22490/ecacen.5440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La curva de Kuznets en el Departamento del Tolima

Abstract: El presente documento realiza una revisión teórica y empírica de la hipótesis de la curva de Kuznets para el Departamento del Tolima, de acuerdo a la teoría existe una relación empírica entre la desigualdad y el crecimiento económico, en este sentido el siguiente escrito explica la teoría y realiza una contrastación de la hipótesis de Kuznets para el Departamento del Tolima. En primer lugar, se presenta el marco teórico y el estado del arte del fenómeno en estudio, en segundo lugar, se presenta los datos utili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the fundamental problem of finding preventive and therapeutic strategies to control the disease -something practically solved thanks to the vaccines -the pandemic has been characterized by an avalanche of information, often incorrect and lacking in scientific evidence, about potential new therapies that did not provide any benefit, but did have an associated risk of adverse effects, sometimes serious or even fatal. 3 Likewise, the appearance of vaccines in record time compared to the usual times of clinical research generated mistrust in some sectors of the population, who viewed with concern the appearance of some serious but at the same time very infrequent adverse events (e.g. cavernous sinus thrombosis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the fundamental problem of finding preventive and therapeutic strategies to control the disease -something practically solved thanks to the vaccines -the pandemic has been characterized by an avalanche of information, often incorrect and lacking in scientific evidence, about potential new therapies that did not provide any benefit, but did have an associated risk of adverse effects, sometimes serious or even fatal. 3 Likewise, the appearance of vaccines in record time compared to the usual times of clinical research generated mistrust in some sectors of the population, who viewed with concern the appearance of some serious but at the same time very infrequent adverse events (e.g. cavernous sinus thrombosis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%