La Diversidad Cultural Colectiva en  Tensión-Sostenida : Una Mirada Desde La Democracia Agonista De Mouffe

Montoya, Angélica Montes

doi:10.1016/j.acso.2016.07.002

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Play Lab seeks to rethink the dimension of conflict and antagonism, overcoming that simplified participatory design that offers order and agreements through assent. Legitimising the conflict involves transforming the idea of the enemy into that of the adversary and resigning the antagonist character at the centre of the democratic discussion [16], and, in the case of the Play Lab, processes of innovation and social change generate a place for social relationships, confrontation and conflict between adversaries does not have to be destroyed but be persuaded or dissuaded. Play Lab proposes an intervention model where the process and the proposal do not nullify conflict but rather absorb it and legitimise it, seeking further depth in the process while using ethnographic tools that allow the understanding of peoples´ stories, their motivations, desires and frustrations, to integrate them into the process beyond the product or project.…”

Section: Participatory Design Methods Evolution and Biasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community Collaboration for product design (co-co design): an academic alternative for social innovation

Maya¹,

Cobreros²,

Ontiveros³

et al. 2019

DS 95: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019), Universit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Playlab, an educational initiative of the School of Architecture, Art and Design of the Tecnologico de Monterrey University, provides a steady academic base for innovation in product co-design adapting to changing social and cultural contexts. Play Lab aims to bring students from different disciplines together to tackle social challenges within a specific local community as a platform for social innovation and moving beyond the classroom into an established social community. The professors deploy a wide arrange of participatory and ethnographic tools from which students choose and implement in the specific community context. Thus, the students have to go through a full and profound social and urban research of the chosen context before deciding on a viable collaboration design. Play Lab has had three iterations with different students in 2016, 2017 and 2018. This paper hopes to compile, compare and explain the processes and results of Play Lab while analysing some variables as a reference. Using a methodology proposed by Hansson et al. (2011) we performed an evaluation of the aforementioned iterations. We believe we have gained clarity regarding future strategies, methods and tools to be further used in Play Lab, our academic alternative for social innovation.

show abstract

Section: Participatory Design Methods Evolution and Biasesmentioning

confidence: 99%