DOI: 10.4995/thesis/10251/61628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La estructura urbana de las ciudades mayas del período clásico.

Abstract: Royal Ontario Museum BALAKBAL MÉXICO CAMPECHE 17ᵒ52'70'' N -89ᵒ35'20'' W F. P. Parris Carnegie Institution of Washington BECÁN MÉXICO CAMPECHE 18ᵒ30'60'' N -89ᵒ28'40'' W F. P. Parris Carnegie Institution of Washington Equipo dirigido por Prentice Marquet Thomas Jr. Tulane University BONAMPAK MÉXICO CHIAPAS 16°42'14'' N -91°03'53'' W

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown & Witschey (2003) This tentative conclusion was reached after conducting my own search of Maya site surveys, consulting both literature and several Mayanists for their opinion. Soon after, Peiró Vitoria's (2015) research reproduced and assembled the greatest collection of Classic period urban centre plans in a single volume, in the process basically confirming this assessment.…”
Section: Maya Urban Traditionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brown & Witschey (2003) This tentative conclusion was reached after conducting my own search of Maya site surveys, consulting both literature and several Mayanists for their opinion. Soon after, Peiró Vitoria's (2015) research reproduced and assembled the greatest collection of Classic period urban centre plans in a single volume, in the process basically confirming this assessment.…”
Section: Maya Urban Traditionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Nevertheless, readily accessible (i.e. published) Maya city plans still concern the results of traditional topographical surface surveys of visible remains (Peiró Vitoria 2015). The nature of tropical archaeological remainsusually badly deteriorated by years of overgrowing reforestation and erosion, and therefore difficult to access and measure -implies that a comprehensive plan of the full extent of a city on the level of detail required may not exist, despite some large-scale long-term archaeological mapping projects.…”
Section: Maya Urban Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of archaeological evidence prevents unequivocal direct arguments from asserting the existence and implementation of urban planning policies in Maya urban landscapes (for discussion, see [31,64]). While large-scale infrastructure and civil engineering, as well as the construction and periodic redesign of major monumental complexes and urban scenes, required planning strategies (see [65]), it is ambiguous whether the layout and positioning of residential units and neighbourhoods were equally subject to coordination (e.g., [66]; cf. [67] on the relating circulation and visibility to the distribution of infrastructure, resource access, and land subdivision).…”
Section: Opportunities For Planning Urban Soil Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%