“…The structural coupling -the exchanges -between those involved and the context would be characterised by simplexity, which would in turn be supported by processes of "typicalisation", or rather of research into similarities between the current situation and previous experiences within forms of generalisation necessary to the action. Other perspectives, substantially relating to the need to grant a renewed centrality to the student as a 'reality' around which we then construct or should construct within the didactic process, propose we basically conceptualise the action in a conversational key (Pellerey, 2014). The studentwith his own 'resistances', unexpected answers, his own way of perceiving the world -is the point of reference for the intense activity that the teacher -starting with his own projects, intentions, hypotheses of action -puts into action upon seeing it as such; rather than being aimed directly at the student, the teacher directs this activity more to himself in order to establish more suitable possibilities for meetings and support, starting with the subjective and objective-instrumental resources that he deems useful for the purpose.…”