2005
DOI: 10.7202/705360ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La modélisation stochastique des étiages: une revue bibliographique

Abstract: SUMMARYThe increasing pressure on the water resources requires better management of the water déficit situations may it be unusual droughts or yearly recurring low-flows. It is therefore important to model the occurrence of thèse déficit events in order to quantify the related risks. Many approaches exist for the modeling of low-flow/drought events. We présent hère a literature review of the stochastic methods. We start by clarifying the différence between lowflows and droughts, two ternis which are often used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matalas (1963), Joseph (1970), Condie and Nix (1975), Tasker (1987), Leppärjärvi (1989) and Yue and Pilon (2005), amongst many others, have compared various distributions and methods to estimate parameters. The best-adjusted distribution is usually different according to the study region and the low-flow index (Abi-Zeid and Bobée, 1999). In other methods, the understanding of the generating processes of low flows contributes to the choice of distribution (Pacheco et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matalas (1963), Joseph (1970), Condie and Nix (1975), Tasker (1987), Leppärjärvi (1989) and Yue and Pilon (2005), amongst many others, have compared various distributions and methods to estimate parameters. The best-adjusted distribution is usually different according to the study region and the low-flow index (Abi-Zeid and Bobée, 1999). In other methods, the understanding of the generating processes of low flows contributes to the choice of distribution (Pacheco et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%