2020
DOI: 10.5093/clysa2019a18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La Personalidad como Vulnerabilidad Unidimensional y Bidimensional: el Papel Mediador de las Variables Cognitivas en la Gravedad Sintomatológica en una Muestra de Personas con Trastorno Grave de Personalidad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to overcome this limitation is to identify categories that classify people (not dimensions or traits) in an exhaustive and exclusive way, so that differences in a dependent variable can be attributed to differences in real people, not in dissected traits. In fact, in a recent work (Ramos, Broco, Sánchez, & Doll, 2019), using a methodology of cluster and discriminant analyses, we found a typology of two exclusive groups that classified all the patients in our sample, namely internalizing vs. externalizing.…”
Section: Eficacia Diferencial Para Internalizadores Y Externalizadorementioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One way to overcome this limitation is to identify categories that classify people (not dimensions or traits) in an exhaustive and exclusive way, so that differences in a dependent variable can be attributed to differences in real people, not in dissected traits. In fact, in a recent work (Ramos, Broco, Sánchez, & Doll, 2019), using a methodology of cluster and discriminant analyses, we found a typology of two exclusive groups that classified all the patients in our sample, namely internalizing vs. externalizing.…”
Section: Eficacia Diferencial Para Internalizadores Y Externalizadorementioning
confidence: 48%
“…We psychometrically (through cluster analysis) found a personality typology potentially useful in this regard, since it can totally and exclusively discriminate participants according to their scores on the 13 personality traits of the MCMI-II: internalizers vs. externalizers. Their respective typological and clinical differences have been described elsewhere (Ramos et al, 2019); here we sought to verify (1) if there was a differential response to the intervention and (2) if any cognitive process could mediate or modulate that response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two categories of the variable "personality type" (INT= internalization and EXT= externalization) are obtained from the scores in each of the 13 personality scales of the MCMI-II through cluster analysis. In recent work (Ramos et al, 2020) the procedure is detailed and the naming of the categories is justified based on their association with different clinical variables. In the present study, the sample is larger (48 more patients) and analyses have been redone from the direct scores.…”
Section: Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present research aims to study the relationship between personality structure, affect structure and coping style in a group of people diagnosed with severe PD in whom personality and affect show their most psychopathological aspect. As personality structure, the model that emerged psychometrically in previous research (Ramos, Broco, Sánchez & Doll, 2020) is chosen, which allows an exhaustive and exclusive classification of the entire sample and that corresponds to a high level of "super factors" in the taxometric hierarchy (Kotov et al, 2017;Widiger et al, 2019): internalization and externalization. The internalizing type is characterized by schizoid, phobic-inviting, schizotypal, and dependent traits; the externalizing group exhibits narcissistic, histrionic, antisocial, and aggressive-sadistic traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…© 2023 Escritos de Psicología Escritos de Psicología,16,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] …”
unclassified