2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La priorización comunitaria en el programa Barcelona Salut als Barris

Abstract: Prioritizing corresponds to the process of selecting and managing health needs identified after diagnosing the community's health needs and assets. Recently, the health needs assessment has been reinforced with the community perspective, providing multiple benefits: it sensitizes and empowers the community about their health, encourages mutual support among its members and promotes their importance by making them responsible for the process of improving their own reality. The objective of this paper is to desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This process enabled rectification and the gathering of new information in order to understand nuances. In addition, it enabled the inclusion of participants in the process, a feature implicit in PAR [ 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Subsequently, a final report was developed and written, incorporating the health problems, community strengths or health assets and women’s proposals for action.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process enabled rectification and the gathering of new information in order to understand nuances. In addition, it enabled the inclusion of participants in the process, a feature implicit in PAR [ 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Subsequently, a final report was developed and written, incorporating the health problems, community strengths or health assets and women’s proposals for action.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the research team produced draft results from the initial analysis, these were presented to the 26 informants, seeking validation and fostering further discussion to help fine-tune or clarify any aspect of the researchers' interpretation. This not only allowed for some rectification but also allowed researchers to collect new information, to understand nuances, and to include participants in the process, thus giving them a true sense of ownership of their own reality [22,32]. Once there was consensual agreement on the final draft, results were presented at the Town Hall, followed by public debate that led to specific commitments by political and sanitation authorities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at other countries, examples can be found in Latin America [18,19] and in Europe, including those associated with the Healthy Cities project that took place in Europe at the end of the 1980s/beginning of the 1990s [20]. These studies were focused mainly on identifying priorities for intervention that stemmed out of these diagnoses but had no follow-up or evidence regarding their actual implementation in the medium or long term [21,22]. Furthermore, in none of these instances was the gender perspective incorporated into the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otro tanto ocurre con la dinámica inicialmente prevista con las ADR. Dado el peso explícito que las diferentes instituciones tienen en cada comarca, se considera recomendable aplicar una metodología que más que contrastar y confrontar busque el mayor consenso posible (Sánchez-Ledesma et al, 2018). Se resumen a continuación los pasos efectuados en esta segunda fase con las ADR:…”
Section: Elaboración Propiaunclassified