2019
DOI: 10.7202/1064725ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La sociologie de l’éducation au croisement de la sociologie de l’action publique : apports des cadres pour une typologie des systèmes d’accountability

Abstract: Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the education system, the term varies (accountability, steering by results, results-based management) and the literature distinguishes them according to the issues associated with them. What they have in common, however, are the new modes of regulation, based on system results (Carnoy, 2005;Voisin & Maroy, 2018).…”
Section: Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the education system, the term varies (accountability, steering by results, results-based management) and the literature distinguishes them according to the issues associated with them. What they have in common, however, are the new modes of regulation, based on system results (Carnoy, 2005;Voisin & Maroy, 2018).…”
Section: Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In French speaking Belgium, since the reform was implemented in 2017, regulation has shifted from soft accountability (Voisin & Maroy, 2018) to a moderate approach. The moderate approach is a hybrid of the "hard" approach, characterized by the possibility of sanctions imposed by the regulator, and the reflexive approach, characterized by the concept of responsibilization, which is at the heart of the regulation process.…”
Section: Second Level Of Analysis: Comparison Of How Concepts Are Def...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, Switzerland belongs, together with its neighbours, to those European countries with poorly instrumented, low-stakes accountability (Brauckmann, Thiel, Kuper, & Tarkian, 2015;Voisin & Maroy, 2018). This is somewhat surprising, as NPM was a dominant reform discourse in Swiss politics from the 1990s onward and education was one of the preeminent fields of discussion (Buschor, 1997).…”
Section: Accountability Conditions In Switzerland After Npm Reforms O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a high-stakes accountability system with threatening sanctions, schools are governed by objectives for self-development, "best practice" peer learning, persuasion and advice (Hangartner & Svaton, 2015). Even though the governance system has been modernised, it still mainly corresponds to the bureaucratic-professional model with low-stakes accountability Voisin & Maroy, 2018).…”
Section: Accountability Conditions In Switzerland After Npm Reforms O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accountability mechanisms and the measures to reach goals and outcomes were thus set in motion at each level of the hierarchy (central, intermediate, and local). In this configured accountability, each stakeholder is responsible for the decisions made with regard to the quality of educational services and school improvement (Voisin and Maroy 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%