Label-Free Biomedical Imaging and Sensing (LBIS) 2022 2022
DOI: 10.1117/12.2609911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-free cellphone microscopy with submicron resolution through high-index contact ball lens for in vivo melanoma diagnostics and other applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An integration of millimeter‐scale ball lenses with index close to two with a smartphone allows the developing pocket‐size microscopes that can be used for biopsy‐free diagnostics of skin diseases. In contrast to previous studies, the compound ball lens/cellphone camera objective has the best resolution ≈0.67 µm at λ = 589 nm [ 646, 647, 658, 659 ] that corresponds to diffraction‐limited imaging with NA ≈ 0.4. Further increase of the resolution might become possible under two conditions: a) use of microspheres with diameters from several microns up to several tenths microns instead of millimeter‐scale ball lenses, b) use of short‐period nanoplasmonic arrays creating a “hot spot” plasmonic illumination for nanoscale objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An integration of millimeter‐scale ball lenses with index close to two with a smartphone allows the developing pocket‐size microscopes that can be used for biopsy‐free diagnostics of skin diseases. In contrast to previous studies, the compound ball lens/cellphone camera objective has the best resolution ≈0.67 µm at λ = 589 nm [ 646, 647, 658, 659 ] that corresponds to diffraction‐limited imaging with NA ≈ 0.4. Further increase of the resolution might become possible under two conditions: a) use of microspheres with diameters from several microns up to several tenths microns instead of millimeter‐scale ball lenses, b) use of short‐period nanoplasmonic arrays creating a “hot spot” plasmonic illumination for nanoscale objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A combination of smartphone microscopy with MSI methods allowed to suggest a radical way [ 646, 647, 658, 659 ] to dramatically increase the magnification and to exceed the resolution limitation determined by the pixilation of the cellphone sensor array. In the limit of geometrical optics, the lateral image magnification ( M ) of ball lens is determined by the following equation [ 656 ] : M0.33em()n,D,gbadbreak=n2()n1()2gD+1n$$\begin{equation}M\ \left( {n^{\prime},D,g} \right) = \frac{{ - n^{\prime}}}{{2\left( {n^{\prime} - 1} \right)\left( {\frac{{2g}}{D} + 1} \right) - n^{\prime}}} \end{equation}$$where D is the diameter of the ball lens, n=nsp/nspn0n0$n^{\prime} = {{{{n}_{sp}}} {/ {\vphantom {{{n}_{sp}} {{n}_0}}}}{{{n}_0}}} $ is the refractive index contrast between the spherical ball lens and object space, and g is the gap between the object and ball lens.…”
Section: Smartphone Ball Lens Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[25] Successes and limitations of MSI microscopy led to a proposal to use high-index ball lenses with significantly larger diameters spanning the range from meso-to millimeter-scale in similar applications, especially in the context of developing high-resolution cellphone-based microscopes. [52][53][54] The ball lenses with n ≈ 2 represent a case of special interest since, according to the paraxial ray tracing, they focus light exactly, on the shadow-side surface of such lenses [55] and, hence, a supermagnified contact-ball imaging is expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%