2019
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning

Abstract: White blood cell (WBC) differential counting is an established clinical routine to assess patient immune system status. Fluorescent markers and a flow cytometer are required for the current state‐of‐the‐art method for determining WBC differential counts. However, this process requires several sample preparation steps and may adversely disturb the cells. We present a novel label‐free approach using an imaging flow cytometer and machine learning algorithms, where live, unstained WBCs were classified. It achieved… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We continued training over the course of one month to promote a model with highest validation accuracy possible, demonstrating stable execution of AID for long run-times. Our results show that the classification performance of AID is at least similar to other publications showing labfel-free discrimination of B-and T-cells (Nassar et al, 2019;Yoon et al, 2018Yoon et al, , 2017. These results suggest feasibility of label-free image-based discrimination of B-and T-cells, which could again be used to complement blood cell counts.…”
Section: Label-free Discrimination Of B-and T-cellssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We continued training over the course of one month to promote a model with highest validation accuracy possible, demonstrating stable execution of AID for long run-times. Our results show that the classification performance of AID is at least similar to other publications showing labfel-free discrimination of B-and T-cells (Nassar et al, 2019;Yoon et al, 2018Yoon et al, , 2017. These results suggest feasibility of label-free image-based discrimination of B-and T-cells, which could again be used to complement blood cell counts.…”
Section: Label-free Discrimination Of B-and T-cellssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Finally, we demonstrate that the tools provided by AID master even challenging classification tasks by training a classifier to distinguish B-and T-cells based on bright-field images from RT-DC. The resulting model reaches a classification performance that is state-of-the-art for label-free approaches (Nassar et al, 2019;Yoon et al, 2018Yoon et al, , 2017. With the demonstrated utility for a wide range of potential image analysis tasks, AID is a ready-to-use software package for anyone who wants to start exploring the power of AI-based image analysis for their own research without the need for any programming skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the leave-one-donor-out test principle [31,38], we wanted the selection of the optimal hyperparameters to be generalizable to new donors as well. Therefore, we applied a nested cross-validation scheme [55,55,56] (Figure 8).…”
Section: Nested Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, to sort T cells in practice, the classifier would need to be coupled to a flow sorter. The flowing nature of the cells may make the resulting images different enough to require a distinct CNN, which is not an obstacle given recent advances in CNNs for imaging flow cytometry 10,21,22,34,48,49 . Overall, our strong results demonstrate the feasibility of classifying T cells directly from autofluorescence intensity images, which can guide future work to bring this technology to pre-clinical and clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trained model must be able to generalize to new donors in order to be useful in a practical pre-clinical or clinical setting. Therefore, all of our evaluation strategies train on images from some donors and evaluate the trained models on separate images from a different donor, which is referred to as subject-wise cross-validation 34 or a leave-one-patient-out scheme 28 . We initially assess the classifiers with cross-validation across donors.…”
Section: /29mentioning
confidence: 99%