2020
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-free profiling of DNA aptamer-small molecule binding using T5 exonuclease

Abstract: In vitro aptamer isolation methods can yield hundreds of potential candidates, but selecting the optimal aptamer for a given application is challenging and laborious. Existing aptamer characterization methods either entail low-throughput analysis with sophisticated instrumentation, or offer the potential for higher throughput at the cost of providing a relatively increased risk of false-positive or -negative results. Here, we describe a novel method for accurately and sensitively evaluating the binding between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rate reduction was calculated by the expression 1 – ( k ligand / k blank ). Finally, resistance values were calculated as previously described . The area under the curve (AUC) of the fluorescence digestion plots was determined using Origin 2019 software, and the resistance value was calculated using the expression (AUC ligand /AUC blank ) – 1.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate reduction was calculated by the expression 1 – ( k ligand / k blank ). Finally, resistance values were calculated as previously described . The area under the curve (AUC) of the fluorescence digestion plots was determined using Origin 2019 software, and the resistance value was calculated using the expression (AUC ligand /AUC blank ) – 1.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we evaluated the binding and target‐induced displacement of five more small‐molecule‐binding DNA aptamers with MTC. As seen in Figure S29, these aptamers are diverse with regard to their size, sequence, and three‐dimensional structure: a 19‐nt ochratoxin A‐binding aptamer containing a triple‐stem structure (OBA3, K D =1.4 μM), [33] a stem‐loop structured 46‐nt aptamer for mephedrone (MMC1, K D =15 μM), [34] 44‐nt dopamine‐ ( K D =150 nM) and serotonin‐binding aptamers ( K D =30 nM) with G‐quadruplex features, [35] and a 40‐nt glucose‐binding aptamer ( K D =10 mM) [35] . All five aptamers could bind to MTC with varying levels of complexation, as evaluated based on their capability to monomerize/dimerize MTC and reduce J‐aggregate concentrations (SI, Figures S29–34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have recently developed exonuclease-based assays based on the inhibition of aptamer digestion by enzymes upon ligand binding to characterize the binding between multiple aptamer-ligand pairs simultaneously in as ingle-pot reaction. [235] Based on our preliminary success in characterizing avariety of aptamers with diverse structure and many ligands with wide-ranging physicochemical properties,w eb elieve that this assay can be readily scaled up to characterize aptamer binding profile in ah igh-throughput, automated fashion. After narrowing down the aptamer candidates, precise quantification of target-binding affinity of aptamers is recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods such as ITC and SPR can determine quantitative binding thermodynamics and kinetics, but are ill‐suited for extensively screening aptamer specificity due to low throughput. We have recently developed exonuclease‐based assays based on the inhibition of aptamer digestion by enzymes upon ligand binding to characterize the binding between multiple aptamer–ligand pairs simultaneously in a single‐pot reaction [235] . Based on our preliminary success in characterizing a variety of aptamers with diverse structure and many ligands with wide‐ranging physicochemical properties, we believe that this assay can be readily scaled up to characterize aptamer binding profile in a high‐throughput, automated fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%