2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-009-0317-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-free quantitation, an extension to 2DB

Abstract: Determining the differential expression of proteins under different conditions is of major importance in proteomics. Since mass spectrometry-based proteomics is often used to quantify proteins, several labelling strategies have been developed. While these are generally more precise than label-free quantitation approaches, they imply specifically designed experiments which also require knowledge about peptides that are expected to be measured and need to be modified. We recently designed the 2DB database which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: the spectra that were successfully assigned a peptide sequence) among samples from different experimental conditions (Washburn et al 2001;Liu et al 2004;Gilchrist et al 2006). In addition the count can be weighted by the total ion current of the counted spectra which can improve its dynamic range (Asara et al 2008;Allmer 2010). Alternatively, it can be weighted by the reported score of the identification software (Allet et al 2004); although one study showed that identification scores may not be strongly correlated with protein abundance (Ong and Mann 2005).…”
Section: Quantitation With Lc-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: the spectra that were successfully assigned a peptide sequence) among samples from different experimental conditions (Washburn et al 2001;Liu et al 2004;Gilchrist et al 2006). In addition the count can be weighted by the total ion current of the counted spectra which can improve its dynamic range (Asara et al 2008;Allmer 2010). Alternatively, it can be weighted by the reported score of the identification software (Allet et al 2004); although one study showed that identification scores may not be strongly correlated with protein abundance (Ong and Mann 2005).…”
Section: Quantitation With Lc-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since spectral counting is rather trivial, the counts are often generated by non specialized software such as PeptideProphet (Keller et al 2002) and MSMAG (Allmer 2010), or by specialized software or scripts (Gao et al 2003;Old et al 2005;Ishihama et al 2005;Huttlin et al 2007). …”
Section: Quantitation With Lc-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A heat map for peptides is found under the tab Peptide Overview and Peptide Details contains the numerical information for the analysis and for each fraction separately. Options such as using peptide standards for normalization are not detailed in this work; they have been presented when MSMAG was first introduced [25]. …”
Section: Quantitation With Post Translational Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method to perform label-free quantitation with liquid chromatography (LC) MS/MS data is to perform spectral counting [21][22][23]. In addition to spectral counting, the count can be weighted by the total ion current (TIC) [24,25] or the reported score of the identification software [26]. MSMAG is an extension to 2DB and can be used for labelfree quantitation essentially as a new feature in the analysis and presentation module while the underlying data model remains unchanged [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation